首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Surgical Oncology: The Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology >Meta-analysis and systematic review on laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer: Preliminary study for a multicenter prospective KLASS07 trial
【24h】

Meta-analysis and systematic review on laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer: Preliminary study for a multicenter prospective KLASS07 trial

机译:腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)的荟萃分析和系统综述:多中心前瞻性KLASS07试验的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The curative surgical treatment of gastric cancer in the current laparoscopic surgical era relies on the surgeon's preference, technical difficulties, and concerns regarding outcome have led to the availability of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). A consensus on which of the two procedures is preferable is necessary. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between LADG and TLDG in terms of surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, pain, and complications.
机译:背景:目前的腹腔镜外科时代胃癌的疗法外科依赖外科医生的偏好,技术困难,并且关于结果的担忧导致了完全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)和腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)的担忧 。 必要的是两个程序中的哪一项共识是必要的。 因此,本研究的目的是在手术结果,术后回收,疼痛和并发症方面评估LADG和TLDG之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号