首页> 外文期刊>Mineral Law Newsletter >West Virginia- Mining / OIL & Gas
【24h】

West Virginia- Mining / OIL & Gas

机译:西弗吉尼亚 - 矿产/石油和天然气

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Reaffirms that Reservation of Interests in "Oil Produced and Saved" and "Consideration for Gas for Each Gas Well Drilled and Producing" Creates Nonparticipating Royalty Interest, and Not Mineral Interest Title examiners in West Virginia have long been vexed by the state's confusing precedents regarding the distinction between mineral interests and royalty interests in oil and gas. Some cases from the early twentieth century seem to suggest that terms like "royalty" were actually synonymous with "minerals" and did not create an interest in the production alone, but by the 1960s, in Davis v. Hardman, 133 S.E.2d 77 (W. Va. 1963), the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals clearly adopted the position that there was a clear distinction between interests in the oil and gas in place and nonparticipating royalty interests. Since that time, the court has not had many opportunities to return to this question.
机译:西弗吉尼亚最高诉讼上诉法院重申,在“石油生产和保存”中的利益保留和“对每个钻井井的燃气审议”创造了非公正的版税兴趣,而不是西弗吉尼亚州的矿物利息审查员长期以来 国家对石油和天然气的矿产利益和版税之间的区别令人困惑的先例。 20世纪初的一些病例似乎暗示了像“皇室里”的术语实际上是“矿物质”的同义词,并没有在戴维斯诉戴维斯·哈夫曼,133E2D 77( W.VA。 从那时起,法院没有有很多机会返回这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号