首页> 外文期刊>Micron: The international research and review journal for microscopy >Analysis and comparison of focused ion beam milling and vibratory polishing sample surface preparation methods for porosity study of U-Mo plate fuel for research and test reactors
【24h】

Analysis and comparison of focused ion beam milling and vibratory polishing sample surface preparation methods for porosity study of U-Mo plate fuel for research and test reactors

机译:聚焦离子梁铣削和振动抛光样品表面制备方法对研究和试验反应器的孔隙率研究的聚焦离子梁研磨和振动抛光样品表面制备方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Uranium-Molybdenum (U-Mo) low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels are a promising candidate for the replacement of high enriched uranium (HEU) fuels currently in use in a high power research and test reactors around the world. Contemporary U-Mo fuel sample preparation uses focused ion beam (FIB) methods for analysis of fission gas porosity. However, FIB possess several drawbacks, including reduced area of analysis, curtaining effects, and increased FIB operation time and cost. Vibratory polishing is a well understood method for preparing large sample surfaces with very high surface quality. In this research, fission gas porosity image analysis results are compared between samples prepared using vibratory polishing and FIB milling to assess the effectiveness of vibratory polishing for irradiated fuel sample preparation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed on sections of irradiated U-Mo fuel plates and the micrographs were analyzed using a fission gas pore identification and measurement script written in MatLab. Results showed that the vibratory polishing method is preferentially removing material around the edges of the pores, causing the pores to become larger and more rounded, leading to overestimation of the fission gas porosity size. Whereas, FIB preparation tends to underestimate due to poor micrograph quality and surface damage leading to inaccurate segmentations. Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, vibratory polishing remains a valid method for porosity analysis sample preparation, however, improvements should be made to reduce the preferential removal of material surrounding pores in order to minimize the error in the porosity measurements.
机译:铀 - 钼(U-Mo)低富集的铀(Leu)燃料是替代目前在世界各地的高功率研究和测试反应器中使用的高富富富富铀(HUU)燃料的有希望的候选者。现代风格U-MO燃料样品制备用于分析裂变气体孔隙率的聚焦离子束(FIB)方法。然而,FIB具有几个缺点,包括减少分析,窗帘效果和增加的FIB操作时间和成本。振动抛光是一种良好的理解方法,用于制备具有非常高的表面质量的大样品表面。在该研究中,比较使用振动抛光和FIB铣削制备的样品之间的裂变气体孔隙图像分析结果,以评估振动抛光对照射燃料样品制剂的有效性。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)成像在照射的U-Mo燃料板的截面上进行,并且使用在Matlab中写入的裂变气体孔识别和测量脚本来分析显微照片。结果表明,振动抛光方法优先除去孔边缘周围的材料,使孔变得更大,更圆润,导致裂变气体孔隙率大大估计。然而,由于显微照片质量和表面损坏导致不准确的细分,因此FIB制剂往往是低估的。尽管上述缺点,振动抛光仍然是孔隙率分析样品制备的有效方法,然而,应采取改进以减少围孔周围材料的优先除去材料,以便最小化孔隙率测量中的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号