...
首页> 外文期刊>Melanoma research >Assessment of internet sources on subungual melanoma
【24h】

Assessment of internet sources on subungual melanoma

机译:评估亚麻瘤的互联网来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, we sought to objectively determine the accuracy and comprehensibility of online material with regard to subungual melanoma, a nail disease that is rare within the general population, yet has high incidence in certain patient groups, and carries a poorer prognosis than other forms of cutaneous melanoma. Because improved prognosis relies on early diagnosis, the dissemination of accurate, understandable information is an important factor in patient education and health. Using a pro forma designed to score website reliability, the accountability, quality, readability, display, support features, and transparency of the most commonly listed search engine hits related to subungual melanoma were analyzed. A total of 27 websites were assessed, with a mean overall score of 16.1 out of a maximum of 40 (range: 7-25). Accountability (mean: 3.4/10, range: 0-9) and quality (mean: 4/10, range: 0-9) varied among websites, while readability was poor overall, with only 22% of websites meeting the accepted seventh grade reading level for online health material. In addition, commonly visited websites for health information, includingand, scored low in readability. Notably, the American Academy of Dermatology website was not listed under any search engine results for subungual melanoma. Our study demonstrates the variability in online materials with regard to subungual melanoma, stressing the importance of scrutinizing internet resources for accuracy and readability when presenting health material. Copyright (c) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,我们寻求客观地确定在线材料的准确性和可理解性,在杂项人群中罕见的指甲疾病,但在某些患者群体中具有很高的发病率,并具有比其他形式更差的预后皮肤黑色素瘤。由于提高预后依赖于早期诊断,因此对准确的传播,可理解的信息是患者教育和健康的重要因素。使用旨在获得网站可靠性的Pro Forma,分析了与汇总黑素瘤相关的最常见的搜索引擎命中的问责制,质量,可读性,显示,支持特征和透明度。评估共27个网站,平均总分16.1的最大值为40(范围:7-25)。问责制(平均:3.4 / 10,范围:0-9)和质量(平均:4/10,范围:0-9)在网站中变化,而可读性整体差,只有22%的网站符合已接受的七年级在线健康材料阅读水平。此外,常见的网站用于健康信息,包括和可读性较低。值得注意的是,美国皮肤科学院网站未在任何搜索引擎的任何搜索引擎中都列出,以逐克黑素瘤。我们的研究展示了在线材料方面的可变性关于杂皮素瘤,强调审查互联网资源在呈现健康材料时进行准确性和可读性的重要性。版权所有(c)2018 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号