首页> 外文期刊>Maternal & child nutrition >A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby‐friendly Hospital status
【24h】

A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby‐friendly Hospital status

机译:婴儿友好型医院地位的比利时产业设施专属母乳喂养比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract A retrospective cross‐sectional study was carried out in Wallonia (the southern region of Belgium) in which a 20‐question breastfeeding (BF) module was included in an immunization survey. The purpose of this paper is to compare exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) prevalences and BF practices for mothers giving birth in Baby‐friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and non‐BFHI maternity facilities. A total of 557 mothers responded to BF questions when their child was 18–24?months old; 26.7% of them delivered in a BFHI maternity facility. At discharge, a larger proportion of children were exclusively breastfed if they were born in a BFHI maternity facility (76.5% vs. 65.8%, p ?=?.02). The median duration of EBF (15.0 vs. 12.9?weeks, p ?=?.3), and the proportion of children exclusively breastfed at 5?months (16.8% vs 15.8%, p ?=?1.0) were similar in both groups. Few mothers knew that EBF was recommended for the first 6?months of life (28.6% in BFHI vs 23.1% in non‐BFHI, p ?=?.2). For most groups of the population examined, the rates of BF tended to be higher in BFHI facilities, but many differences were not significant. More specifically, BFHI seemed to boost BF practices among mothers more likely to breastfeed, but the Initiative did not seem to trigger enhanced BF practices in mothers traditionally less likely to breastfeed (except for indifferent/negative partner's attitude and mothers of Belgian origin). Influencing the BF practices of mothers less likely to breastfeed requires a special attention with complementary actions in maternity facilities as well as in community services.
机译:摘要在瓦隆山脉(比利时南部地区)进行了回顾性横截面研究,其中包括20宗母乳喂养(BF)模块的免疫调查。本文的目的是比较婴儿友好医院倡议(BFHI)和非BFHI产业设施出生的母亲的独家母乳喂养(EBF)普遍存在和BF实践。当他们的孩子18-24岁时,共有557名母亲回复了BF问题;其中的26.7%在BFHI产妇设施中交付。在出院时,如果他们出生在BFHI产科设施(76.5%与65.8%,P?= 02)中,则母乳喂养更大比例的儿童。 EBF的中值持续时间(15.0与12.9?周,P?=?3),并且在5月(16.8%vs 15.8%,p?=Δ1.0)中相似的儿童专门母乳喂养的儿童比例。很少有母亲知道EBF是推荐的前6个月的生活(BFHI在非BFHI的28.6%,P?= 2)。对于审查的大多数人群,BF的BF率在BFHI设施中倾向于更高,但许多差异并不重要。更具体地说,BFHI似乎在母亲更容易母乳喂养中提高了BF实践,但似乎并没有刺激传统上不太可能母乳喂养的母亲的增强的BF实践(除了无动于衷/消极的伴侣的态度和比利时的态度之外)。影响母乳母亲不太可能母乳喂养的BF实践需要特别关注产妇设施以及社区服务的互补行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号