首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Indirect Reciprocity and Charitable Giving-Evidence from a Field Experiment
【24h】

Indirect Reciprocity and Charitable Giving-Evidence from a Field Experiment

机译:来自现场实验的间接互惠和慈善授予证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates two channels of prosociality: indirect reciprocity and charitable giving. We conducted a natural field experiment in a hair salon in Hamburg, Germany, over the course of four months. In the baseline, we collected data on customers' tips-a scenario absent indirect reciprocity and donations. In two treatments we had the hairdresser collect donations to a charity. In one treatment the hairdresser pointed out the opportunity to donate. Our data indicate that the voluntary activity of collecting donations in the salon led to greater tips for the hairdresser and significant donations. In the second treatment, the hairdresser unconditionally donated to the charity before the customers could. This donation did not increase tips further compared with the collection-only treatment. Our data indicate that indirect reciprocity works in the field. We find evidence that indirect reciprocity and charitable giving work as complements.
机译:本文调查了两个Prosociality渠道:间接互惠和慈善捐赠。 我们在德国汉堡的一个美发沙龙中进行了一项自然田野实验,在四个月的过程中。 在基线中,我们收集了客户提示的数据 - 一种情况不存在间接互惠和捐赠。 在两种治疗中,我们有理发师收集捐赠给慈善机构。 在一次治疗中,美发师指出了捐赠的机会。 我们的数据表明,收集沙龙捐赠的自愿活动导致了理发师的更大提示和大量捐赠。 在第二种治疗中,在客户可以之前无条件地向慈善机构无条件地捐赠给慈善机构。 与仅收集的治疗相比,这项捐款没有进一步增加提示。 我们的数据表明间接互惠在该领域工作。 我们发现证据表明间接互惠和慈善工作作为补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号