...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology research and practice >Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol versus Lactulose Oral Solution for Bowel Preparation prior to Colonoscopy
【24h】

Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol versus Lactulose Oral Solution for Bowel Preparation prior to Colonoscopy

机译:聚乙二醇对结肠镜检查前肠道乳糖口服溶液的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective. This study was conducted to compare a lactulose oral solution with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) formulation for colonoscopy preparation using the following metrics: quality of cleansing, colonoscopy outcomes, patient/physician satisfaction, and patient tolerability. Methods. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups and received a single 2?L dose of either PEG (PEG group) or lactulose (Lac group). The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) was used for assessing the cleansing quality of the bowel preparations. Patient tolerability and adverse events were obtained through the completion of questionnaires. Results. The lactulose oral solution showed superior bowel cleansing compared to PEG, as evidenced by higher BBPS scores in the Lac group for all segments of the colon (P<0.05). The detection rates of polyps and intestinal lesions in the Lac group (30.68% and 36.36%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the PEG group (12.50% vs. 13.63%, respectively). For the degree of satisfaction, the Lac group had significantly higher scores compared to the PEG group, as evaluated by both the patients and endoscopist. PEG was associated with an increased incidence of nausea. There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of vomiting, abdominal pain or fullness, dizziness, unfavorable palatability, dry mouth, palpitation, tinnitus, and tongue numbness. Conclusion. A single 2?L dose of a lactulose oral solution had higher efficacy, improved tolerability, and acceptable safety for bowel preparation when compared to the same volume of PEG. Thus, a lactulose oral solution may be a potential bowel-cleansing option for colonoscopy preparation.
机译:客观的。进行该研究以将乳糖口服溶液与聚乙二醇(PEG)配方进行比较,用于使用以下度量进行结肠镜检查:清洁,结肠镜检查结果,患者/医师满意度和患者可耐受性。方法。将注册的患者随机分为两组,并接受单个2?L剂量的PEG(PEG组)或乳果(LAC组)。波士顿肠道制备量表(Bbps)用于评估肠道制剂的清洁质量。通过完成问卷获得患者可耐受性和不良事件。结果。与PEG相比,乳糖口服溶液显示出优异的肠道清洁,如LAC组中的较高Bbps分数用于结肠的所有区段(P <0.05)。 LAC组中息肉和肠病变的检测率(分别为30.68%和36.36%)显着高于PEG组(分别为12.50%,分别为13.63%)。对于满意度,LAC组与PEG组相比显着更高,如患者和内窥镜师的评估。 PEG与恶心发病率增加有关。呕吐,腹痛或丰满,头晕,不利适应性,干燥口,心悸,耳鸣和舌麻木之间没有统计差异。结论。与相同体积的PEG相比,单乳糖口服溶液的乳糖口服溶液的疗效较高,可耐受性和可接受的安全性具有更高的疗效,改善的耐受性和可接受的安全性。因此,乳糖口服溶液可以是用于结肠镜检查的潜在的肠清洗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号