首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Challenges for bridging the gap between knowledge and governance in sustainability policy - The case of OECD 'Focal Points' for Policy Coherence for Development
【24h】

Challenges for bridging the gap between knowledge and governance in sustainability policy - The case of OECD 'Focal Points' for Policy Coherence for Development

机译:促进可持续发展政策知识与治理之间差距的挑战 - 以经合组织的发展政策一致性的经合组织“重点”的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Academic and practical actors have made new claims to foster the link between research, policymaking and sustainability. While some argue in favor of a democratization of knowledge through transdisciplinary research, others suggest that planetary boundaries require urgent political measures that need to be implemented - if necessary - against established standards of democracy. This article criticizes these two positions arguing that decision-making needs to equally reflect knowledge and political interests. Research and political Utilization thereby need to be strictly separated in order to ensure democratic processes and academic freedom. How can scientific research be used successfully for sustainability policy? According to the RIU model the link between knowledge and governance is realized through intermediary processes of Integration. In order to study scientific knowledge, transfer empirically and analyze integration in the area of sustainability policy, the article offers findings from a qualitative analysis of the epistemic community for 'Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development' around the OECD Focal Points.
机译:学术和实践行动者已经提出了新的索赔,促进研究,政策制定和可持续性之间的联系。虽然有些人通过跨学科研究支持知识的民主化,但其他人表明行星边界需要需要执行的紧急政治措施 - 如有必要 - 反对既定的民主标准。本文批评这两个职位认为,决策需要同样反映知识和政治利益。从而需要严格分开研究和政治利用,以确保民主程序和学术自由。科学研究如何成功地用于可持续发展政策?根据RIU模型,通过集成中介过程实现了知识和治理之间的联系。为了研究科学知识,经验和分析可持续发展政策领域的融合,文章提供了对经合组织焦点周围的“可持续发展的政策一致性的政策一致性”的定性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号