...
首页> 外文期刊>Fetal diagnosis and therapy >Clinical and Economic Impact of Adopting Noninvasive Prenatal Testing as a Primary Screening Method for Fetal Aneuploidies in the General Pregnancy Population
【24h】

Clinical and Economic Impact of Adopting Noninvasive Prenatal Testing as a Primary Screening Method for Fetal Aneuploidies in the General Pregnancy Population

机译:采用非侵入性产前检测作为胎儿非妊娠人群胎儿空转化初级筛选方法的临床和经济影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of adopting noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using circulating cell-free DNA as a first-line screening method for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in the general pregnancy population. Methods: A decision-analytical model was developed to assess the impact of adopting NIPT as a primary screening test compared to conventional screening methods. The model takes the Belgium perspective and includes only the direct medical cost of screening, diagnosis, and procedure-related complications. NIPT costs are EUR 260. Clinical outcomes and the cost per trisomy detected were assessed. Sensitivity analysis measured the impact of NIPT false-positive rate (FPR) on modelled results. Results: The cost per trisomy detected was EUR 63,016 for conventional screening versus EUR 66,633 for NIPT, with a difference of EUR 3,617. NIPT reduced unnecessary invasive tests by 94.8%, decreased procedure-related miscarriages by 90.8%, and increased trisomies detected by 29.1%. Increasing the FPR of NIPT (from < 0.01 to 1.0%) increased the average number of invasive procedures required to diagnose a trisomy from 2.2 to 4.5, respectively. Conclusion: NIPT first-line screening at a reasonable cost is cost-effective and provides better clinical outcomes. However, modelled results are dependent on the adoption of an NIPT with a low FPR.
机译:目的:评价采用非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)使用循环无细胞DNA作为一般妊娠人群三种术21,18和13的一线筛选方法的临床和经济影响。方法:制定了决策分析模型,以评估与常规筛选方法相比采用NIPT作为初级筛选试验的影响。该模型采用比利时视角,仅包括筛选,诊断和程序相关并发症的直接医疗成本。 NIPT费用为260欧元。评估临床结果和检测到的每分三胞的成本。敏感性分析测量了NIPT假率(FPR)对模拟结果的影响。结果:检测到的每个三元素的成本为63,016欧元,用于常规筛查,欧元66,633欧元,差异为3,617欧元。 NIPT减少了不必要的侵入性试验94.8%,减少了与程序相关的流产减少90.8%,并增加了29.1%的三元。增加粘液的FPR(从<0.01-1.0%)增加了诊断从2.2至4.5的三兆字形所需的平均侵入性程序数。结论:采用合理成本的Nipt第一线筛选是具有成本效益,提供更好的临床结果。然而,建模结果取决于采用NIPT具有低FPR的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号