首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >SHIFTING SANDS IN THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM: “ARBITRAGE” IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS
【24h】

SHIFTING SANDS IN THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM: “ARBITRAGE” IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS

机译:在国际经济体系中转移砂:“国际经济法和国际人权”中的“套利”

获取原文
       

摘要

International economic law is in the middle of rapid sea changes,arising from converging demands for deep reform on all fronts. These reforms range from current initiatives to recast the orthodox substantive guarantees of foreign market access, investment protection, prudential regulation and financial stability to states,choices between paths of unilateralism, bilateralism, regionalism, multilateralism, or some hybrid multi-speed variation between gradualism and compliance with economic commitments. They also include the formulation of different proposals to revise the dispute settlement mechanisms in world trade law, to rewrite the terms of investor-state dispute settlement,and to harden a definitive dispute settlement process for states ’ international financial obligations. Beyond these main threads of reform, however, international economic law is also increasingly challenged to meet frontier regulatory challenges, such as those arising from new disruptive technologies in the “sharing economy ” and their implications for ensuring fair competition through cross-border anti-trust laws.
机译:国际经济法处于迅速的海洋变化中,因融合要求对所有方面的深入改革而产生的。这些改革范围从目前的倡议重新重新举行国外市场准入,投资保护,审慎监管和金融稳定的国家,双边主义路径,双边主义,区域主义,多边主义之间的选择,或者渐进主义之间的一些混合多速度变化遵守经济承诺。他们还包括制定不同建议,修改世界贸易法中的争端解决机制,以重写投资者国家争端解决方案,并强化各国国际财务义务的最终争端解决进程。然而,除了这些改革的主要线程之外,国际经济法也越来越受到符合边境监管挑战的挑战,例如来自“分享经济”中的新的破坏性技术产生的那些,以及通过跨境反叛信托确保公平竞争的影响法律。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号