首页> 外文期刊>Geriatrics & gerontology international. >Validity of maximum isometric tongue pressure as a screening test for physical frailty: Cross‐sectional study of Japanese community‐dwelling older adults
【24h】

Validity of maximum isometric tongue pressure as a screening test for physical frailty: Cross‐sectional study of Japanese community‐dwelling older adults

机译:最大等距舌压力的有效性作为物理脆弱的筛选试验:日本社区居民老年人的横截面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aim Maximum isometric tongue pressure (MIP) seems to have a diagnostic value for oral phase dysphagia. The present study aimed to examine the association between MIP and frailty, and to assess the screening validity of MIP for physical frailty. Methods We carried out a cross‐sectional study, and enrolled participants aged ≥60 years from Japanese national medical check‐ups in 2015 and 2016. The Fried frailty phenotype model was used. We analyzed odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of physical frailty using one standard deviation increments of tongue pressure. Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to predict physical frailty using MIP values. Results Out of 1603 participants, 968 were categorized as non‐frail, 605 as pre‐frail and 30 as frail. In logistic regression analysis, one standard deviation increment of MIP significantly differentiated frail and pre‐frail: the OR for frail with one standard deviation increment in MIP was 0.37 (95% CI 0.26–0.54, P 0.001), and the OR for pre‐frail was 0.63 (95% CI 0.57–0.70, P 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting frailty with MIP score was as high as 0.776 (95% CI 0.689–0.862). A point of MIP 35 kPa had a sensitivity of 90.0%, specificity of 40.4%, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.5 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.2 for predicting frailty. Conclusions MIP performance is independently associated with frailty. MIP also can be used as a simple screening tool for frailty. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 240–249 .
机译:摘要瞄准最大等距舌压(MIP)似乎具有口腔相位吞咽困难的诊断价值。本研究旨在审查MIP和Freailty之间的关联,并评估MIP的筛查有效性。方法采用2015年和2016年日本全国医学检查的横断面研究,并注册了≥60岁的参与者。使用油炸的脆弱表型模型。我们使用一种标准偏差增量分析了物理脆弱的差距(或)和95%置信区间(CI)的差异。获得接收器操作特性曲线以使用MIP值预测物理脆弱。在1603名参与者中,968名分类为非脆弱,605作为预先勒出,30分为305。在Logistic回归分析中,MIP的一个标准偏差增量显着差异化的虚弱和预体:MIP中一个标准偏差增量的脆弱是0.37(95%CI 0.26-0.54,P <0.001),以及预体为0.63(95%CI 0.57-0.70,P <0.001)。接收器下的区域,用于预测MIP评分的脆弱性曲线高达0.776(95%CI 0.689-0.862)。 MIP 35 KPA的一点敏感性为90.0%,特异性为40.4%,阳性似然比为1.5,负似然比为0.2,用于预测脆弱。结论MIP性能与Freaily独立相关。 MIP还可以用作脆弱的简单筛选工具。 GeriaTr Gerontol int 2018; 18:240-249。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Island and Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Global Health Medicine and WelfareNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical;

    Department of Island and Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki;

    Department of Global Health Medicine and WelfareNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical;

    Department of Island and Community MedicineNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;
  • 关键词

    aging; frailty; geriatric medicine; maximum isometric tongue pressure; screening;

    机译:老化;脆弱;老年医学;最大等距舌压;筛选;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号