首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Reliability of functional and predictive methods to estimate the hip joint centre in human motion analysis in healthy adults
【24h】

Reliability of functional and predictive methods to estimate the hip joint centre in human motion analysis in healthy adults

机译:估算健康成年人人体运动分析中髋关节中心的功能和预测方法的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In human motion analysis predictive or functional methods are used to estimate the location of the hip joint centre (HJC). It has been shown that the Harrington regression equations (HRE) and geometric sphere fit (GSF) method are the most accurate predictive and functional methods, respectively. To date, the comparative reliability of both approaches has not been assessed. The aims of this study were to (1) compare the reliability of the HRE and the GSF methods, (2) analyse the impact of the number of thigh markers used in the GSF method on the reliability, (3) evaluate how alterations to the movements that comprise the functional trials impact HJC estimations using the GSF method, and (4) assess the influence of the initial guess in the GSF method on the HJC estimation. Fourteen healthy adults were tested on two occasions using a three-dimensional motion capturing system. Skin surface marker positions were acquired while participants performed quite stance, perturbed and non-perturbed functional trials, and walking trials. Results showed that the HRE were more reliable in locating the HJC than the GSF method. However, comparison of inter-session hip kinematics during gait did not show any significant difference between the approaches. Different initial guesses in the GSF method did not result in significant differences in the final HJC location. The GSF method was sensitive to the functional trial performance and therefore it is important to standardize the functional trial performance to ensure a repeatable estimate of the HJC when using the GSF method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在人体运动分析中,使用预测或功能方法来估计髋关节中心(HJC)的位置。已经表明,Harrington回归方程(HRE)和几何球体配合(GSF)方法分别是最准确的预测性和功能方法。迄今为止,两种方法的比较可靠性尚未被评估。本研究的目的是(1)比较HRE和GSF方法的可靠性,(2)分析GSF方法中使用的大腿标记数对可靠性的影响,(3)评估如何改变包括功能试验的运动使用GSF方法影响HJC估计,(4)评估在GSF方法中对HJC估计的初始猜测的影响。使用三维运动捕获系统两次测试十四个健康的成年人。获得皮肤表面标记位置,而参与者表现出相当姿态,扰动和非扰动的功能试验,以及行走试验。结果表明,在定位HJC而不是GSF方法时,HRE更可靠。然而,在步态期间,会话间髋关节运动学的比较并未显示这种方法之间的任何显着差异。 GSF方法中的不同初始猜测不会导致最终HJC位置的显着差异。 GSF方法对功能试验性能敏感,因此在使用GSF方法时,可以标准化功能试验性能,以确保HJC的可重复估计。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号