首页> 外文期刊>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: Official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) >Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences
【24h】

Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences

机译:基于办公室的与手术室进行喉咽手术:审查成本差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Office-based transnasal flexible endoscopic surgery under topical anesthesia has recently been developed as an alternative for transoral laryngopharyngeal surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between the two surgical settings. Methods PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on costs of laryngopharyngeal procedures that could either be performed in the office or operating room (i.e., laser surgery, biopsies, vocal fold injection, or hypopharyngeal or esophageal dilation). Quality assessment of the included references was performed. Results Of 2953 identified studies, 13 were included. Quality assessment revealed that methodology differed significantly among the included studies. All studies reported lower costs for procedures performed in the office compared to those performed in the operating room. The variation within reported hospital and physician charges was substantial. Conclusion Office-based laryngopharyngeal procedures under topical anesthesia result in lower costs compared to similar procedures performed under general anesthesia.
机译:目的,局部麻醉下的基于办事处的跨养老术内镜手术是在全身麻醉下的传统喉咽手术的替代方案。本研究的目的是评估两种手术环境之间的医疗保健成本差异。方法搜索有关喉咽手术成本的研究报告,可以在办公室或手术室(即,激光手术,活检,声毒折叠注射或后咽或后咽或食管扩张)进行喉咽手术的研究报告。综合参考的质量评估进行了。结果2953年确定的研究,包括13项。质量评估显示,在内的研究中,方法不同。所有研究报告,与手术室中的执行情况相比,办公室在办公室执行的程序成本降低。报告的医院和医生费用内的变化很大。结论局部麻醉下的办事处喉咽手术导致较低的成本与在全身麻醉下进行的类似程序相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号