首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >The Effects of Modified Simiao Decoction in the Treatment of Gouty Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

The Effects of Modified Simiao Decoction in the Treatment of Gouty Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:改性辛菊汤治疗痛风性关节炎的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The modified Simiao decoctions (MSD) have been wildly applied in the treatment of gouty arthritis in China. However, the evidence needs to be evaluated by a systematic review and meta-analysis. After filtering, twenty-four randomised, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of MSD and anti-inflammation medications and/or urate-lowering therapies in patients with gouty arthritis were included. In comparison with anti-inflammation medications, urate-lowering therapies, or coadministration of anti-inflammation medications and urate-lowering therapies, MSD monotherapy significantly lowered serum uric acid (p < 0.00001, mean difference = -90.62, and 95% CI [-128.38, -52.86]; p < 0.00001, mean difference = -91.43, and 95% CI [-122.38, -60.49]; p = 0.02, mean difference = -40.30, and 95% CI [-74.24, -6.36], resp.). Compared with anti-inflammation medications and/or urate-lowering therapies, MSD monotherapy significantly decreased ESR (p < 0.00001; mean difference = -8.11; 95% CI [-12.53, -3.69]) and CRP (p = 0.03; mean difference = -3.21; 95% CI [-6.07, -0.36]). Additionally, the adverse effects (AEs) of MSD were fewer (p < 0.00001; OR = 0.08; 95% CI [0.05,0.16]). MSD are effective in the treatment of gouty arthritis through anti-inflammation and lowering urate. However, the efficacy of MSD should be estimated with more RCTs.
机译:改进的辛菊脱离(MSD)已经疯狂地应用于中国痛风关节炎的治疗。但是,需要通过系统审查和荟萃分析来评估证据。在过滤后,包括术后二十四项随机受控试验(RCT)比较MSD和抗炎药物和/或尿酸盐降低疗法在痛风关节炎患者中的疗效。与抗炎药物的抗炎药物,尿酸盐疗法或抗炎药物的共同分子和尿酸盐疗法,MSD单药治疗显着降低了血清尿酸(P <0.00001,平均差= -90.62和95%CI [ - 128.38,-52.86]; P <0.00001,平均差异= -91.43和95%CI [-122.38,-60.49]; p = 0.02,平均差异= -40.30,95%CI [-74.24,-6.36], resp。)。与抗炎药和/或尿液疗法降低,MSD单药治疗显着降低ESR(P <0.00001;平均差异= -8.11; 95%CI [-12.53,-3.69])和CRP(P = 0.03;平均差异= -3.21; 95%CI [-6.07,-0.36])。另外,MSD的不良反应(AES)较少(P <0.00001;或= 0.08; 95%CI [0.05,0.16])。 MSD通过抗炎和降低呼吸治疗痛风关节炎。然而,MSD的功效应估计更多的RCT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号