首页> 外文期刊>Experimental & Molecular Pathology >Comparison of two techniques for a comprehensive gut histopathological analysis: Swiss Roll versus Intestine Strips
【24h】

Comparison of two techniques for a comprehensive gut histopathological analysis: Swiss Roll versus Intestine Strips

机译:两种技术的综合肠道组织病理学分析的比较:瑞士卷与肠带

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Assessing the gut mucosa milieu is important to grade the inflammatory process in conditions such as food hypersensitivity, allergy, gut parasitosis, etc. However, the gastrointestinal tract comprises a challenging system to evaluate, due to its thin tubular structure and mucosa, which suffer fast autolysis after death. Irrespective of the preferred inflammatory score system, it is important to choose the technique that will render the best tissue analysis. Thus, our aim was to compare two of the most frequently used methods to collect, process and analyze gut segments, the Swiss Roll and the Intestinal Strips. Normal C57B1/6 mice were randomly assigned to Rolls or Strips group. After an overdose of anesthetics, segments of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum were collected and prepared accordingly for histological processing and analysis. Our results show the villi in the Rolls tend to be shorter and wider than those in the Strips in the duodenum and jejunum but not the ileum. No significant differences were observed in intra-epithelial lymphocytes and goblet cells counts. Finally, we staged each segment using our histomorphometric classification system, which revealed that although all animals presented a normal intestinal mucosa, those assigned to the Rolls group had their mucosa staged in the Infiltrative Stage while the Strips group had their mucosa staged as Normal. In conclusion, Swiss Rolls might be desirable for a wider assessment of the intestine, as it allows large segments to be analyzed at once, while Strips are better suited when detailed evaluation of each villus is intended.
机译:评估肠霉素Milieu在食物超敏反应,过敏,肠道诱导症等条件下对炎症过程进行评分重要性,胃肠道包括挑战性的系统,以评估其薄管状结构和粘膜,这遭受快速死后自然分解。无论优选的炎症评分系统如何,重要的是选择将使最好的组织分析的技术。因此,我们的目标是比较两个最常用的方法来收集,处理和分析肠道,瑞士卷和肠道。将正常的C57b1 / 6小鼠随机分配给卷或条带组。在过量的麻醉剂后,根据组织学加工和分析,收集并制备并制备联盟,Jejunum和Hileum的细分。我们的结果表明,卷中的绒毛往往比十二指肠和Jejunum中的条带中的绒毛更短,而不是回肠。在上皮细胞内淋巴细胞和脚卵细胞计数中没有观察到显着差异。最后,我们使用我们的组织形态分类系统分段,这揭示了所有动物呈现正常的肠粘膜,所以分配给卷组的那些在渗透阶段的粘膜中持续,而STRIPS组的粘膜是正常的。总之,瑞士卷可能需要对肠道更广泛的评估,因为它允许立即分析大段,而当每个绒毛的详细评估进行详细评估时,条带更适合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号