首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and therapeutic medicine >Comparative study of ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasound in diagnosis of malignant anus neoplasm
【24h】

Comparative study of ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasound in diagnosis of malignant anus neoplasm

机译:超声弹性成形术和常规超声诊断中的对比研究恶性肛门肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The application value of conventional ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography (UE) in preoperative diagnosis and combined diagnosis of malignant anus neoplasms was investigated. One hundred and twenty patients, whose mass was detected by digital rectal examination, were examined using UE and conventional ultrasound before operation, and the results were compared with those of histopathological examinations after operation, so that the accuracy and imaging features of UE as well as UE combined with conventional ultrasound in diagnosing malignant anus neoplasm were analyzed. Among the 120 patients, 77 were diagnosed with benign lesions and 43 were diagnosed with malignant lesions via pathological diagnosis for anal canal lesion surgery. Conventional ultrasound before operation showed that 53 patients were diagnosed with benign lesions and 26 with malignant lesions. Compared with that in the pathological diagnosis results, the diagnostic accordance rate in preoperative conventional ultrasound was 65.8%. Through UE diagnosis, 66 patients had benign lesions and 39 patients had malignant lesions. Compared with that in the pathological diagnosis results, the diagnostic accordance rate in preoperative UE was 87.5%. After the examination via UE combined with conventional ultrasound before operation, 71 patients were diagnosed with benign lesions and 40 patients were diagnosed with malignant lesions; compared with that in the pathological diagnosis results, the diagnostic accordance rate was 92.5%. In terms of mass qualitative diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of conventional ultrasound were 60.5 and 68.8%, respectively; those of UE were 90.7 and 85.7%, respectively, and those of UE combined with conventional ultrasound were 93.0 and 92.2%, respectively. According to the analysis results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under curve (AUC) of malignant anus neoplasm diagnosed via UE was 0.732 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.211-2.534], the AUC via conventional ultrasound was 0.695 (95% CI, 0.517-0.932), and that via UE combined with conventional ultrasound was 0.823 (95% CI, 0.146-4.643). In conclusion, examinations utilizing UE combined with conventional ultrasound can increase the preoperative diagnostic accordance rate in malignant anus neoplasm, which can be used as an effective method for preoperative diagnosis of malignant anus neoplasm.
机译:研究了常规超声波和超声弹性成像(UE)在术前诊断和恶性肛门肿瘤的诊断中的应用价值。在经营前通过数字直肠检查检测到肿块的一百二十名患者,并在操作前进行常规超声检查,并将结果与​​操作后的组织病理学检查的结果进行比较,从而使UE的精度和成像特征以及UE与常规超声结合在诊断恶性肛门肿瘤中。在120例患者中,77例被诊断为良性病变,通过病理诊断治疗恶性病变,对肛管病变手术进行病理诊断。操作前常规超声证明53名患者被良性病变和26例诊断出恶性病变。与在病理诊断结果中相比,术前常规超声中的诊断按率为65.8%。通过UE诊断,66名患者良性病变,39名患者发生恶性病变。与病理诊断结果相比,术前UE的诊断按率为87.5%。通过UE检查后,在手术前结合常规超声波,71名患者被诊断患有良性病变,40名患者被诊断出恶性病变;与病理诊断结果相比,诊断按率为92.5%。在大规模定性诊断方面,常规超声的敏感性和特异性分别为60.5%和68.8%; UE的那些分别为90.7和85.7%,并且UE与常规超声组合的那些分别为93.0和92.2%。根据接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线的分析结果,通过UE诊断为0.732 [95%置信区间(95%CI),通过常规的AUC的曲线(AUC)下的区域为0.732 [95%CI),0.211-2.534]超声波为0.695(95%CI,0.517-0.932),通过UE与常规超声组合为0.823(95%CI,0.146-4.643)。总之,利用UE与常规超声结合的考试可以增加恶性肛门肿瘤中的术前诊断率,可作为术前诊断恶性肛门肿瘤的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号