...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice
【24h】

Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice

机译:基于临床实践中力控制压缩桨的压力控制乳房X线照相压缩桨的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectivesTo reduce pain and discomfort associated with breast compression in mammography, a pressure-controlled compression paddle was recently introduced.The objective was to evaluate the pressure-controlled paddle by comparing it to the standard force-controlled paddle.MethodsDifferences of compressed breast thickness (CBT), compression force, compression pressure, and average glandular dose (AGD) between annual follow-up full-field digital mammography exams of 3188 patients were retrospectively examined. Two groups were compared: (1) force-force group (FF-group), both examinations were performed with the force-controlled paddle, and (2) force-pressure group (FP-group), only the follow-up examination was performed with the pressure-controlled paddle.In an additional group of patients, pain scores on a scale of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) were evaluated prospectively (n=343) who were randomly assigned to either paddle.ResultsMedian differences between follow-up exams in CBT, compression force, compression pressure, and AGD were for the FF- and FP-group respectively -1.0 vs 0.0mm (p 2mm; force >2daN; pressure >1kPa and AGD >0.1mGy). The subanalysis dividing CBT into five categories revealed similar results. The median [interquartile range] pain scores were 6 [3, 7] and 5 [3, 7] for the force-controlled and pressure-controlled paddle, respectively, which was not significantly different (p=0.113).ConclusionsWe observed no clinically relevant differences in CBT, compression force, compression pressure, AGD, or pain score between the force- and pressure-controlled paddle. As such, we found no basis for preferring one paddle over the other.Key Points The pressure-controlled paddle did not show any clinically relevant changes in breast compression parameters compared to the force-controlled paddle. The pressure-controlled paddle did not lead to significant reduction in pain scores indicated by the patients compared to the force-controlled paddle. A large variation in compression force and compression pressure was observed in mammography exams for the both the force- and pressure-controlled compression paddle.
机译:目的旨在减少与乳房X线照相乳房压缩相关的疼痛和不适,最近介绍了一种压力控制的压缩桨。目的是通过将其与标准力控制的桨叶进行比较来评估压力控制的桨叶。压缩胸厚度的方法(CBT回顾性检查了3188名患者的年后续全场数字乳腺X线摄影考试之间的压缩力,压缩压力和平均腺剂量(AGD)。比较两组:(1)迫使力组(FF-GROUP),两种检查都用力控制的桨,(2)力 - 压力组(FP-GROUP)进行,只有后续检查用压力控制的桨式进行。一组患者,疼痛分数为0(根本没有疼痛)至10(最痛苦的疼痛)(n = 343)被随机分配给桨用于CBT,压缩力,压缩压力和AGD的后续检查之间的后续考试之间的差异分别为-1.0毫米0.0mm(P 2mm;力> 2dan;压力> 1kpa和Agd> 0.1强)。将CBT分为五类的子分析显示出类似的结果。中位数[四分位数]疼痛评分分别为力控制和压力控制的桨的6 [3,7]和5 [3,7],其没有显着差异(P = 0.113)。Conclusionswe在临床上观察到在力和压力控制的桨叶之间的CBT,压缩力,压缩压力,AGD或疼痛评分的相关差异。因此,我们发现没有依赖于另一个桨的基础。在与力控制的桨叶相比,压力控制的桨叶没有显示乳房压缩参数的任何临床相关变化。与力控制的桨叶相比,压力控制的桨没有导致患者所示的疼痛评分显着降低。在乳房X线摄影考试中观察到压缩力和压缩压力的大变化,用于两个力和压力控制的压缩桨叶。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European radiology》 |2019年第5期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Maastricht Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med P Debyelaan 25 POB 5800 NL-6202 AZ Maastricht;

    Maastricht Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med P Debyelaan 25 POB 5800 NL-6202 AZ Maastricht;

    Maastricht Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med P Debyelaan 25 POB 5800 NL-6202 AZ Maastricht;

    Maastricht Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med P Debyelaan 25 POB 5800 NL-6202 AZ Maastricht;

    Maastricht Univ Med Ctr Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med P Debyelaan 25 POB 5800 NL-6202 AZ Maastricht;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学;
  • 关键词

    Mammography; Radiation dosage; Pain;

    机译:乳房X线照相术;辐射剂量;疼痛;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号