...
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in cervical fusion in a new sheep model

机译:新羊模型宫颈融合中Peek棒与钛合金棒的比较有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Pedicle screw and rod instrumentation based on titanium can produce satisfying strength and stiffness for spinal fusion. However, excessive stiffness produced by titanium rods may cause stress shielding. Thus, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods with a low modulus of elasticity were introduced as substitutes for titanium rods. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in anterior spinal fusion with a new sheep model. Methods Sheep models of anterior-posterior cervical fusion were innovatively adopted in our study. Twenty-four sheep were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group that received anterior-posterior cervical fixation with titanium rods or PEEK rods, respectively. Then, surgical segments were harvested and assessed by X-ray, micro-CT and histological examination to evaluate the efficiency of bone fusion. Results No complications related to fixation were found during the research process. The results of the X-ray showed a stronger spinal fusion in the PEEK rod groups than in the titanium rod group at 12 weeks postoperatively, and both groups underwent bone fusion at 24 weeks postoperatively. The results of micro-CT showed that fixation with PEEK rods achieved better bone ingrowth at an early postoperative stage (12 weeks) compared to fixation with titanium rods (bone volume fraction (BVF): 20.26 +/- 4.36% vs 14.48 +/- 3.49%, p < 0.05). The same trend was detected in the histological analysis, where the mineralized bone fraction in the experiment group (21.01 +/- 3.48%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (16.73 +/- 2.95%). In addition, better osseointegration was found in the experiment group at the early postoperative stage at 12 weeks (bone apposition (BA): 16.22 +/- 3.24% vs 11.67 +/- 3.63%, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences at 24 weeks postoperatively. Conclusion PEEK rods can be used safely in a sheep model of anterior-posterior cervical fixation. Compared to traditional titanium rods, earlier and more evident bone fusion was found in the PEEK rods group. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
机译:基于钛的背景椎弓根螺钉和杆仪器可以产生满足脊柱融合的强度和刚度。然而,钛棒产生的过度刚度可能导致应力屏蔽。因此,将具有低弹性模量的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)棒作为钛棒作为替代品。本文的目的是比较Peek棒与新羊模型前脊柱融合中的钛合金棒的有效性。方法在我们的研究中创新了前后宫颈融合的绵羊模型。将二十四只绵羊随机分为对照组和接受用钛棒或PEEK棒的前后宫颈固定的治疗组。然后,通过X射线,微型CT和组织学检查收获和评估手术区段,以评估骨融合的效率。结果在研究过程中没有发现与固定相关的并发症。 X射线的结果表明,垂直于术后12周的PEEK杆组中脊柱融合的较强的脊柱融合,并且两组术后24周接受骨融合。微型CT的结果表明,与用钛棒的固定(骨体积分数(BVF):20.26 +/- 4.36%VS 14.48 +/- 4.36%,用垂直阶段(12周)的术后阶段(12周)的固定在术后阶段(12周)的固定达到了更好的骨头生长。 3.49%,P <0.05)。在组织学分析中检测到相同的趋势,其中实验组中的矿化骨分数(21.01 +/- 3.48%)显着高于对照组(16.73 +/- 2.95%)。此外,在术后阶段的实验组在12周的实验组中发现了更好的骨整合(骨骼邻接(BA):16.22 +/- 3.24%Vs 11.67 +/- 3.63%,P <0.05)。但是,术后24周没有显着差异。结论PEEK棒可安全地使用前后宫颈固定的绵羊模型。与传统的钛棒相比,Peek Rods组中发现了早期和更明显的骨融合。图形摘要可以在电子补充材料下检索这些幻灯片。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号