首页> 外文期刊>European journal of heart failure: journal of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology >Are the effects of drugs to prevent and to treat heart failure always concordant? The statin paradox and its implications for understanding the actions of antidiabetic medications
【24h】

Are the effects of drugs to prevent and to treat heart failure always concordant? The statin paradox and its implications for understanding the actions of antidiabetic medications

机译:药物的影响是预防和治疗心力衰竭的效果始终合一齐全吗? 他汀类悖论及其对理解抗糖尿病药物的作用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most treatments for chronic heart failure are effective both in preventing its onset and reducing its progression. However, statins prevent the development of heart failure, but they do not decrease morbidity and mortality in those with established heart failure. This apparent discordance cannot be explained by an effect to prevent interval myocardial infarctions. Instead, it seems that the disease that statins were preventing in trials of patients with a metabolic disorder was different from the disease that they were treating in trials of chronic heart failure. The most common phenotype of heart failure in patients with obesity and diabetes is heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this disorder, the anti‐inflammatory effects of statins might ameliorate myocardial fibrosis and cardiac filling abnormalities, but these actions may have little relevance to patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whose primary derangement is cardiomyocyte loss and stretch. These distinctions may explain why statins were ineffective in trials that focused on HFrEF, but have been reported to produce favourable effects in observational studies of HFpEF. Similarly, selective cytokine antagonists were ineffective in HFrEF, but have been associated with benefits in HFpEF. These observations may have important implications for our understanding of the effects of antihyperglycaemic medications. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists have had neutral effects on heart failure events in people at risk for HFpEF, but have exerted deleterious actions in HFrEF. Similarly, sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors, which exert anti‐inflammatory effects and reduce heart failure events in patients who are prone to HFpEF, may not be effective in HFrEF. The distinctions between HFrEF and HFpEF may explain why the effects of drugs on heart failure events in diabetes trials may not be relevant to their use in patients with systolic dysfunction.
机译:对于慢性心力衰竭的大多数治疗方法都是有效的,都在预防其发作并降低其进展方面都有效。然而,他汀类药物阻止了心力衰竭的发展,但它们不会降低具有既熟悉心力衰竭的人的发病率和死亡率。这种明显的不障碍不能通过效果来解释,以防止间隔心肌梗塞。相反,似乎他汀类药物预防代谢疾病患者试验的疾病不同于他们在慢性心力衰竭试验中治疗的疾病。肥胖患者和糖尿病患者的心力衰竭最常见的表型是心力衰竭,具有保存的喷射部分(HFPEF)。在这种疾病中,他汀类药物的抗炎作用可能会改善心肌纤维化和心脏填充异常,但这些动作可能与心力衰竭患者的相关性和降低的射血分数(HFREF)相关,其主要紊乱是心肌细胞损失和伸展。这些区别可以解释为什么他汀类药物在重点关注HFREF的试验中是无效的,但据报道,在HFPEF的观察研究中产生有利影响。类似地,选择性细胞因子拮抗剂在HFREF中无效,但已与HFPEF中的益处相关。这些观察可能对我们对抗涩药物的影响的理解具有重要意义。胰高血糖素类肽-1受体激动剂对HFPEF风险的心力衰竭事件的中性作用对HFPEF的风险,但在HFREF中施加有害行为。类似地,钠 - 葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂,其在易于HFPEF的患者中发挥抗炎作用和减少心力衰竭事件,可能在HFREF中无效。 HFREF和HFPEF之间的区别可以解释为什么药物对糖尿病试验中的心力衰竭事件的影响可能与其在收缩功能障碍患者中的​​使用不相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号