首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology >Gradual Versus Continuous Increase of Load in Ergometric Tests: Are the Results Comparable?
【24h】

Gradual Versus Continuous Increase of Load in Ergometric Tests: Are the Results Comparable?

机译:测功测试中负荷的逐渐与持续增加:结果是否可比?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Standard exercise testing (ET) comprises progressive exercise provocation with cardiovascular monitoring. Exercise tolerance is estimated by workload. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a non-invasive measurement of ventilator/ gas exchange which provides more accurate quantifications of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Workload is usually increased stepwise in ET and continuously (ramp) in CPX. Our aim was to examine the comparability of the results. Thirty two healthy volunteers (17 females/15 males, age 26.8 ± 6.1 years, BMI 24.5 ± 3.0) underwent exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer up to maximum physical exhaustion; under ramp protocol (CPX) and 2-7 days later with a stepwise increase of workload (ET).
机译:标准运动测试(ET)包括进行性运动激发和心血管监测。运动耐力由工作量估算。心肺运动测试(CPX)是对呼吸机/气体交换的一种非侵入性测量,可以更准确地量化心肺健康(CRF)。在ET中,工作量通常逐步增加,而在CPX中则连续增加(斜坡)。我们的目的是检查结果的可比性。 32名健康志愿者(17名女性/ 15名男性,年龄26.8±6.1岁,BMI 24.5±3.0)在自行车测力计上进行了运动测试,以最大程度地体力消耗;在斜坡协议(CPX)下和2-7天后,工作量(ET)逐步增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号