首页> 外文期刊>European journal of applied physiology >Effects of different increments in workload and duration on peak physiological responses during seated upper-body poling
【24h】

Effects of different increments in workload and duration on peak physiological responses during seated upper-body poling

机译:不同增量在坐姿稳定期间工作量和持续时间持续时间的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose To compare the effects of test protocols with different increments in workload and duration on peak oxygen uptake ((V) overdotO(2peak)), and related physiological parameters during seated upper-body poling (UBP). Methods Thirteen upper-body trained, male individuals completed four UBP test protocols with increments in workload until volitional exhaustion in a counterbalanced order: 20 W increase/every 30 s, 20 W/60 s, 10 W/30 s and 10 W/60 s. Cardio-respiratory parameters and power output were measured throughout the duration of each test. Peak blood lactate concentration (bLa(peak)) was measured after each test. Results The mixed model analysis revealed no overall effect of test protocol on (v) overdotO(2peak), peak minute ventilation (VEpeak), peak heart rate (HRpeak), bLa(peak) (all p >= 0.350), whereas an overall effect of test protocol was found on peak power output (POpeak) (p = 0.0001), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (p = 0.024) and test duration (p < 0.001). There was no difference in POpeak between the 20 W/60 s (175 +/- 25 W) and 10 W/30 s test (169 +/- 27 W; p = 0.092), whereas POpeak was lower in the 10 W/60 s test (152 +/- 21 W) and higher in the 20 W/30 s test (189 +/- 30 W) compared to the other tests (all p = 0.001). In addition, RER was 9.9% higher in the 20 W/30 s compared to the 10 W/60 s test protocol (p = 0.003). Conclusions The UBP test protocols with different increments in workload and duration did not influence (V) overdotO(2peak), and can therefore be used interchangeably when (V) overdotO(2peak) is the primary outcome. However, POpeak and RER depend upon the test protocol applied and the UBP test protocols can, therefore, not be used interchangeably when the latter is the primary outcome parameter.
机译:目的,用于比较测试方案在工作量的不同增量和峰值氧气摄取的持续时间((v)夸张(2peak))的效果,以及在坐着的上体抛光(Ubp)期间的相关生理参数。方法三十头体训练,雄性个人在工作负载中增加了四种UBP测试协议,直到平衡顺序的加速耗尽:20 W增加/每30秒,20个W / 60 S,10 W / 30 S和10 W / 60 s。在每次测试的持续时间内测量心动呼吸参数和功率输出。每次试验后测量峰血液乳酸浓度(BLA(峰))。结果混合模型分析揭示了(v)过滴(2peak),高峰微量通风(vepeak),峰心率(Hrpeak),Bla(峰值)(所有P> = 0.350)的整体效果,而总体而言在峰值功率输出(Popeak)(P = 0.0001),呼吸交换比(RER)(P = 0.024)和测试持续时间(P <0.001)上发现了测试方案的影响。 20 w / 60 s(175 +/- 25 w)和10 w / 30 s测试之间的popeak没有差异(169 +/- 27 w; p = 0.092),而Popeak在10 w /与其他试验相比,20W / 30秒试验(189 +/- 30 W)中的60秒测试(152 +/- 21 W)(189 +/- 30 W)(所有p = 0.001)。此外,与10W / 60 S试验方案相比,20W / 30秒的RER为9.9%(p = 0.003)。结论工作量和持续时间不同增量的UBP测试协议不影响(v)overdoto(2peak),因此当(v)overdoto(2peak)是主要结果时,可以互换使用。然而,Popeak和RER取决于所应用的测试协议,因此,当后者是主要结果参数时,UBP测试协议可以不可互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号