首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome.
【24h】

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome.

机译:体外冲击波碎石术是老年尿结石患者的首选治疗选择吗?患者年龄对治疗结果影响的多变量分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of patient age on the stone-free rate (SFR) in patients with urinary calculi treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 2192 solitary radio-opaque urinary stones of 5-15 mm were identified in adult patients receiving primary ESWL. Patients were divided into three age groups, i.e. < or = 40, 41-60 and >60 years (579, 1026 and 587 patients, respectively). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of age and other possible predicting factors (gender, stone characteristics, e.g. side, site and size, and the type of lithotripter used) on the SFR at 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The overall adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for the SFR for those aged 41-60 and >60 years (taking those aged < or= 40 years as the reference) were 0.708 (0.573-0.875; P = 0.001) and 0.643 (0.506-0.818; P < 0.001). However, if the patients were divided into those with renal or ureteric stones, only the SFR of the former was affected by age, and the adjusted odds ratios were 0.665 (0.512-0.864; P = 0.002) and 0.629 (0.470-0.841; P = 0.002), respectively. Ageing had no effect on the SFR for ureteric stones. CONCLUSION: The SFR after ESWL for renal stones, but not ureteric stones, was significantly lower in older patients. Further studies on the effects of ageing on renal stone clearance after ESWL are needed to improve stone management in the elderly population.
机译:目的:研究患者年龄对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗的尿路结石患者无结石率(SFR)的影响。患者和方法:在接受原发性ESWL的成年患者中,总共鉴定出2192例5-15 mm的不透射线的不透尿路结石。将患者分为三个年龄组,即<或= 40、41-60和> 60岁(分别为579、1026和587名患者)。治疗后3个月,采用多因素logistic回归评估年龄和其他可能的预测因素(性别,结石特征,例如侧面,部位和大小以及所用碎石仪的类型)对SFR的影响。结果:41-60岁和> 60岁(以<或= 40岁的人为参考)的SFR的总体调整优势比(95%置信区间)为0.708(0.573-0.875; P = 0.001)和0.643(0.506-0.818; P <0.001)。但是,如果将患者分为患有肾结石或输尿管结石的患者,则只有前者的SFR受年龄的影响,调整后的优势比分别为0.665(0.512-0.864; P = 0.002)和0.629(0.470-0.841; P = 0.002)。老化对输尿管结石的SFR没有影响。结论:ESWL后肾结石的SFR(而非输尿管结石)在老年患者中显着降低。需要进一步研究衰老对ESWL后肾结石清除的影响,以改善老年人口的结石管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号