首页> 外文期刊>Ecological engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology >Diversity and succession of riparian plant communities along riverbanks bioengineered for erosion control: a case study in the foothills of the Alps and the Jura Mountains
【24h】

Diversity and succession of riparian plant communities along riverbanks bioengineered for erosion control: a case study in the foothills of the Alps and the Jura Mountains

机译:河岸河岸生物工厂侵蚀控制的多样性和继承 - 侵蚀控制:以阿尔卑斯山山麓和汝拉山脉为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Soil bioengineering for riverbank stabilization involves the use of living plant materials to treat unstable or eroding riverbanks. These near-natural structures may harbor a higher plant richness and vegetation cover compared to classical civil engineering structures such as ripraps, but little information exists on vegetation dynamics during secondary succession on stabilized riverbanks. We hypothesized that soil bioengineering, by means of active introduction of early successional Salix shrubs, can foster successional trajectories of riparian plant communities, unlike civil engineering. We sampled three types of riverbank stabilization structures: pure bioengineering structures, mixed structures (combining riprap and bioengineering techniques) and ripraps, across a 14-year sequence on 42 sites located along 23 different streams running through the foothills of the Alps and the Jura Mountains (France and Switzerland). We quantified species richness and density and compared the temporal patterns of four groups of species that normally appear sequentially in natural succession on riverbanks (ruderal, hygrophilous, shade-tolerant, competitive species), as well as non-native species. Plant community composition differed greatly between ripraps and the two types of bioengineered sites, and ligneous species typical of advanced successional stages (Cornus sanguinea, Corylus avellana) spontaneously established in the oldest bioengineered sites. In general, richness of total species was higher in stabilization structures using soil bioengineering (including mixed structures) than in riprapped sites. In particular, the number of shade-tolerant and competitive species in bioengineered sites was double that found at ripraps after 14 years. Yet, richness of shade-tolerant species increased over time only on purely bioengineered sites, and their density there was almost twice that in mixed structures. Neither the type of stabilization structure nor time explained the variability in richness and density of non-native species across sites. Our study showed that along streams running through foothills, where erosion processes are usually intense, vegetation of bioengineered riverbanks exhibits successional dynamics similar to those theoretically found in natural conditions. Bioengineering can therefore foster ecological processes while stabilizing eroding riverbanks along foothill streams, thus satisfying human needs for infrastructure protection with less impact on the riparian ecosystem than riprap structures.
机译:河岸稳定的土壤生物工程涉及使用生活植物材料来治疗不稳定或侵蚀的河岸。与普遍存在的土木工程结构相比,这些近乎自然的结构可能涉及更高的植物丰富性和植被覆盖,但在稳定的河岸上的次级继承期间植被动态存在于植被动态的情况下。我们假设土壤生物工程,通过积极引入早期的继承酱灌木,可以促进河岸植物社区的连续轨迹,与土木工程不同。我们采样了三种类型的河岸稳定结构:纯生物工程结构,混合结构(结合RIPRAP和生物工程技术)和RIPRAP,在沿着沿着阿尔卑斯山和汝拉山脉的山脚山脉和汝拉山脉的23个不同的流赛中的42个网站(法国和瑞士)。我们量化了物种丰富性和密度,并比较了四组种类的时间模式,这些物种通常依次出现在河岸(粗鲁,尚,耐污染,竞争物种)以及非本地物种中。植物群落组成在重新于最古老的生物工程站自发地建立的覆盖率和两种生物工程位点和两种类型的生物工程位点和两种生物工程阶段(Cornus Sanguinea,Corylus Avellana)之间的典型典型的旋转物种。通常,使用土壤生物工程(包括混合结构)的稳定结构中总物种的丰富性较高,而不是在裂纹的位置。特别地,生物工程位点中的耐肤地和竞争性物种的数量是在14年后在Ripraps发现的两倍。然而,耐候物种的丰富性仅随着时间的推移而增加,并且它们的密度几乎存在混合结构中的两倍。稳定结构的类型和时间都不解释跨地网站的非本地物种的丰富度和密度的可变性。我们的研究表明,沿着山麓跑的溪流,其中侵蚀过程通常是激烈的,生物工程般的河岸的植被表现出与自然条件中理论上的理论上相似的连续动态。因此,生物工程可以促进生态过程,同时稳定沿山麓小溪的侵蚀河岸,从而满足基础设施保护的人类需求,而不是对河岸生态系统的影响而不是雷皮特结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号