...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology >Project portfolio selection for construction contractors by MCDM-GIS approach
【24h】

Project portfolio selection for construction contractors by MCDM-GIS approach

机译:MCDM-GIS方法的建筑承包商项目组合选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, project portfolio selection (PPS) is considered as one of the main steps in project portfolio management (PPM). PPS which depends on different criteria such as strategic, financial, as well as project specifications is also suggested for construction contractors. Although it is difficult to consider all these criteria, the decision will be inaccurate when some of them are ignored. The most common multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies and geographic information system (GIS) are combined as a method, by which the potential projects obtain a strategic score by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Then, they are ranked according to technical criteria by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The proposed approach includes three ordinal phases. First, scoring potential projects due to the company strategy is conducted by the AHP to determine strategic-aligned projects (SAPs). Then, SAPs are ranked by TOPSIS. Finally, the final GIS sheet is prepared by the obtained technical score and communal criteria. This paper provides a clear and comprehensive insight to accept or reject SAPs by form a weighted sheet in GIS. It suggests that CCs select project portfolio according to all the financial and non-financial criteria. This approach can satisfy the PPM principals and resolve some of the shortcomings related to MCDM methods by GIS capacities to reduce complexity so that the decision-makers form project portfolios easily and effectively. This approach is described in a case study.
机译:在本文中,项目组合选择(PPS)被视为项目组合管理(PPM)中的主要步骤之一。建筑承包商还提出了依赖于不同标准的不同标准,如战略,财务,以及项目规范。虽然很难考虑所有这些标准,但是当其中一些被忽略时,决定将不准确。最常见的多标准决策(MCDM)方法和地理信息系统(GIS)组合为一种方法,潜在项目通过分析层次处理(AHP)获得战略评分。然后,它们根据技术标准进行排序,通过与理想解决方案(Topsis)的相似性进行顺序偏好。所提出的方法包括三个序序。首先,由AHP进行了由公司战略进行的评分潜在项目,以确定战略对齐的项目(SAPS)。然后,SAP由TOPSIS排名。最后,最终的GIS表由获得的技术得分和公共标准编写。本文通过在GIS中形成加权表来提供明确而全面的洞察力,可以通过在GIS中形成加权表来接受或拒绝SAP。它表明,CCS根据所有财务和非财务标准选择项目组合。这种方法可以满足PPM主体,并通过GIS能力解决与MCDM方法相关的一些缺点,以降低复杂性,以便决策者容易有效地形成项目组合。在案例研究中描述了这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号