首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems >Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in colorectal surgery comparing with traditional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in colorectal surgery comparing with traditional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery: A meta-analysis

机译:与传统腹腔镜手术或开放手术相结直肠手术中DA Vinci手术系统的疗效:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to compare the curative effect of the Da Vinci surgical system (DVSS) with laparoscopic surgery (LS) or open surgery for colorectal resection, literature search was conducted in PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database (Embase), and Cochrane library up to January 15, 2016. Odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used as effect size for evaluation of different outcomes. In total, 10 studies consisting of 2767 patients were included for the meta-analysis. As a result, there were no significant differences between DVSS and LS/open surgery in the long-term oncologic outcomes (p > 0.05). However, DVSS achieved a significantly lower length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss (EBL), but a longer operation time. Moreover, DVSS showed a significantly reduced conversion to open surgery than LS (OR = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.48). Subgroup analysis indicated that DVSS had different results in rectal adenocarcinoma and colon cancer subgroups on outcomes of conversion to open surgery and operation time. DVSS is superior to LS/open surgery in length of hospital stay and EBL, but needs longer operation time. Long-term outcomes of DVSS are comparable with the other approaches. From long-term perspective, DVSS has an equivalent effect to the other two techniques.
机译:为了比较Da Vinci外科系统(DVS)与腹腔镜手术(LS)或结直肠切除的开放手术,文献搜索是在PubMed,Excerpt Medica数据库(EMBASE)和1月15日的Cochrane图书馆进行的,2016年。使用相应的95%置信区间的差距(或)和加权平均差异用作评估不同结果的效果大小。共有10项由2767名患者组成的研究,用于Meta分析。结果,在长期肿瘤结果中DVS和LS /开放手术之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。然而,DVSS达到了高度较低的医院住宿和估计的血液损失(EBL),但操作时间较长。此外,DVSS显示出显着降低的转化转化为开放手术而不是LS(或= 0.19,95%置信区间:0.08-0.48)。亚组分析表明,DVS对直肠腺癌和结肠癌亚组的结果不同,转化为开放手术和操作时间。 DVSS优于医院住宿长度的LS /开放式手术,但需要更长的操作时间。 DVS的长期结果与其他方法相当。从长期的角度来看,DVSS对其他两种技术具有相同的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号