首页> 外文期刊>International archives of allergy and immunology >Do Plantago lanceolata Skin Prick Test-Positive Patients Display IgE to Genuine Plantain Pollen Allergens? Investigation of Pollen Allergic Patients from the North-East of France
【24h】

Do Plantago lanceolata Skin Prick Test-Positive Patients Display IgE to Genuine Plantain Pollen Allergens? Investigation of Pollen Allergic Patients from the North-East of France

机译:Plantago lanceolata皮肤刺肌刺阳性患者展示IgE对真正的植物花粉过敏原吗? 法国东北部花粉过敏患者调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: English plantain (Plantago lanceolata) is an important weed pollen allergen source triggering allergic symptoms during summer. To elucidate genuine versus cross-reactive sensitization, we investigated IgE reactivity patterns and inhibition capacities of plantain-sensitized patients. Methods: Sera of 35 rhinoconjunctivitis patients from the north-east of France with positive skin prick tests (SPT) to Plantago lanceolata pollen were tested with clinically relevant allergen sources using ELISA, ImmunoCAP, and immuno-blot inhibition. Results: The patients were multisensitized with additional reactivity to grass (94.3%), ash (74.3%), birch (71.4%), and mugwort (55.2%) pollen in SPT. Sensitization prevalence to allergen molecules was 34.3% (Pla 11), 94.3% (Phl p 1/5), 60.0% (Ole e 1), 65.7% (Bet v 1), 37.1% (profilin), and 40.0% (CCD). In immunoblot, IgE reactivity to plantain pollen was inhibited with relevant pollen extracts and purified rPla 11. Two sera did not reveal any IgE cross-reactivity, while reactivity to plantain was efficiently inhibited by grass pollen in the sera of 10 patients. The sera from 17 different patients could be inhibited by grass, birch, or ash pollen to varying degrees. Thus, only 37.1% of our patients demonstrated true plantain pollen sensitization, while 62.9% were solely positive due to IgE cross-reactive molecules from other clinically relevant pollen. Conclusions: Plantain pollen-sensitized patients are multi-reactors demonstrating varying and complex IgE-reactivity profiles. In vivo and in vitro tests using extracts are typically blurred due to the presence of homologous allergens or CCD in grass, birch, or ash pollen. So far, Pla I 1 represents the only indicative marker allergen for the diagnosis of genuine plantain pollen sensitization. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:英国班斯坦工人(Plantago Lanceolata)是一个重要的杂草花粉过敏原源引发夏季过敏症状。为了阐明真正的交叉反应性敏感,我们研究了植物致敏患者的IgE反应性模式和抑制能力。方法:使用ELISA,Immunocap和免疫印迹抑制,在法国向北脊髓刺痛的35名来自法国东北部的鼻咽炎患者(SPT)对Plantago Lanceolata Pollen进行测试。结果:患者对SPT的额外反应性(94.3%),灰(74.3%),桦木(71.4%)和汞曲线(55.2%)花粉中的额外反应性有多抗。对过敏原分子的敏化患病率为34.3%(PLA 11),94.3%(PHL P 1/5),60.0%(OLE E 1),65.7%(BET V 1),37.1%(Profilin)和40.0%(CCD )。在免疫印迹中,对植物花粉的IgE反应性受到相关的花粉提取物和纯化的RPL111。两种血清没有揭示任何IgE交叉反应性,而10名患者的草花粉是有效地抑制对植物的反应性。来自17例不同患者的血清可以被草,桦木或灰烬花粉抑制到不同程度。因此,只有37.1%的患者证明了真正的植物花粉致敏,而62.9%由于来自其他临床相关的花粉的IgE交叉反应分子而单纯阳性。结论:植物花粉敏化患者是多反应器,证明不同且复杂的IgE反应性谱。在体内和使用提取物的体外试验通常由于草,桦木或灰花粉中的同源过敏原或CCD存在而模糊。到目前为止,PLA I 1代表了唯一的指示性标志剂过敏原,用于诊断真正的植物花粉致敏。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号