首页> 外文期刊>International endodontic journal >A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals
【24h】

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

机译:对前100名最引用的随机对照试验,系统评价和荟萃分析在牙髓期刊上发表的生物计量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Aim To identify and analyse the main features of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals from 1961 to 2018. Methodology The Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science ‘All Databases’ was used to search and analyse the 100 most frequently cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses having ‘randomized’, ‘randomised’, ‘randomized controlled’, ‘randomised controlled’, ‘randomized controlled trial’, ‘randomized controlled trials’, ‘clinical trial’, ‘systematic’, ‘systematic review’, ‘meta‐analysis’, and ‘meta‐analyses’ in the title section. The ‘International Endodontic Journal’, ‘Journal of Endodontics’, ‘Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology’, ‘Australian Endodontic Journal’, ‘Endodontics & Dental Traumatology’, ‘Endo‐Endodontic Practice Today’ and ‘European Endodontic Journal’ were included in the publication name section. After ranking the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts, each article was cross‐matched with the citation counts in Elsevier's Scopus and Google Scholar. The articles were analysed, and information on citation counts, citation density, year of publication, contributing authors, institutions and countries, journal of publication, study design, topic of the article and keywords was extracted. Results The citation counts of the 100 most‐cited articles varied from 235 to 20 (Web of Science), 276 to 17 (Scopus) and 696 to 1 (Google Scholar). The year in which the top 100 articles were published was 2010 ( n ?=?13). Among 373 authors, the greatest number of articles was associated with three individuals namely Reader A ( n ?=?5), Beck M ( n ?=?5) and Kvist T ( n ?=?5). Most of the articles originated from the United States ( n ?=?24) with the greatest contribution from Ohio State University ( USA ) ( n ?=?5). Randomized controlled trials were the most frequent study design ( n ?=?45) followed by systematic reviews ( n ?=?30) with outcome studies of root canal treatment being the major topic ( n ?=?35). The Journal of Endodontics published the largest number of included articles ( n ?=?70) followed by the International Endodontic Journal ( n ?=?27). Among 259 unique keywords, meta‐analysis ( n ?=?23) and systematic review ( n ?=?23) were the most frequently used. Conclusion This study has revealed that year of publication had no obvious impact on citation count. The bibliometric analysis highlighted the quantity and quality of research, and the evolution of scientific advancements made in the field of Endodontology over time. Articles before 1996, that is prior to the CONSORT statement that encouraged authors to include specific terms in the title and keywords, may not have been included in this electronic search.
机译:摘要旨在识别和分析1961年至2018年在末底期刊上发表的前100名最引用的随机对照试验的主要特征,系统评价和荟萃分析。方法学克拉敏分析的科学网络“所有数据库”习惯了搜索和分析100个最常用的随机对照试验,系统评价和荟萃分析,“随机”,“随机”,“随机控制”,“随机对照”,“随机对照试验”,“随机对照试验”,“临床试验“,”系统“,”系统审查“,”荟萃分析“和”荟萃分析“和”荟萃分析“。 “国际脊髓期杂志”,“末神经学杂志”,“口腔外科口语口药口腔病理口腔放射学和脊髓源性”,'澳大利亚脊髓期杂志','endodontics&牙科创伤学“今天的endo-endodontic练习”和“欧洲脊髓期刊”包括在出版物名称部分中。根据其引文计数以降序排列文章在排名后,每篇文章与elestvier的Scopus和Google Scholar的引文交叉。分析了物品,提取了有关引文计数,引文,出版年份,作者,机构和国家,出版,研究设计,文章主题,文章和关键词的引文,引用密度,发表年度的信息。结果100个最具引用的文章的引用计数从235到20(科学网),276到17(Scopus)和696至1(Google Scholar)不同。第100篇文章发表的年份是2010年(n?=?13)。在373个作者中,最多的文章与三个人有关,即读者A(n?=?5),Beck M(n?=?5)和kvist t(n?=?5)。大多数源自美国的文章(N?= 24),来自俄亥俄州州立大学(美国)的最大贡献(n?=?5)。随机对照试验是最常见的研究设计(n?=?45),然后是系统评论(n?=?30),具有根管治疗的结果研究是主要主题(n?= 35)。末污学杂志公布了包含的文章(n?=?70),后者是国际脊髓轴颈(n?= 27)。在259个唯一的关键字中,Meta分析(n?=?23)和系统评论(n?=?23)是最常使用的。结论本研究显示出版年份对引用计数没有明显影响。圣经测定分析强调了研究的数量和质量,以及随着时间的推移在脊髓囊然学领域进行的科学进步的演变。 1996年之前的文章,即在联盟声明之前,鼓励作者在标题和关键字中包含特定条款,可能没有包含在此电子搜索中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号