...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive and critical care nursing >Protective isolation precautions for the prevention of nosocomial colonisation and infection in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Protective isolation precautions for the prevention of nosocomial colonisation and infection in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:防止医院定植和烧伤患者感染的保护隔离预防措施:系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives To assess the impact of protective isolation precautions on nosocomial colonisation and infection rates in burn patients. Research methodology A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of studies identified through Pubmed and Web of Science. Only articles in English were considered. The Downs and Black tool was used to evaluate their methodological quality. Random-effects meta-analysis obtained pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of nosocomial colonisation and infection rates. Results Five eligible before-after studies were identified, encompassing a total of 3033 patients (1192 in the experimental group; 1841 in the control group). Varying protective isolation precautions were investigated, resulting in high clinical heterogeneity. Quality assessment revealed overall poor methodological quality. Protective isolation significantly reduces combined colonisation and infection rates compared to baseline care (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40–0.69; P Conclusions Protective isolation precautions appear to decrease the risk of colonization and infection in burn patients. Because of the absence of higher quality study designs, clinical heterogeneity and the small number of studies involved, these results must be interpreted cautiously.
机译:摘要目的,评估保护性隔离预防措施对烧伤患者医院定植和感染率的影响。研究方法进行系统审查和荟萃分析,进行了通过PubMed和Science网站确定的研究。只考虑英语文章。缩小和黑色工具用于评估它们的方法质量。随机效应Meta分析获得了汇集的风险比(RRS)和95%的置信区间(CIS)的医院定植和感染率。结果鉴定出5次毕业后,鉴定了533名患者(实验组1192; 1841年)。研究了不同的保护性隔离预防措施,导致临床异质性高。质量评估揭示了整体差的方法质量。与基线护理相比,保护性分离显着降低了组合的定植和感染率(RR 0.52,95%CI 0.40-0.69; P结论似乎降低了烧伤患者的定植和感染风险。由于没有更高质量的研究设计,临床异质性和少数研究所涉及的,这些结果必须谨慎地解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号