首页> 外文期刊>Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age >Ideation in an online participatory platform: Towards a conceptual framework
【24h】

Ideation in an online participatory platform: Towards a conceptual framework

机译:在线参与式平台中的思想:走向概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With the development of online participatory platforms, many governments are extending consultation processes beyond traditional face-to-face meetings. These online spaces are used by government agencies to collect ideas from the public and to aggregate preferences through non-binding voting procedures. Many of these digital platforms allow residents to post comments, creating potential for ideation processes. Examining data from an unmoderated online platform initiated by a municipal government, this paper explores whether ideation emerged organically in the deliberation process, and if so, how this occurred. After analyzing over 800 comments in the 20 most highly discussed ideas debated in the forum, the study confirmed that ideation took place and identified five main activities in the process: idea proposal, idea reception, idea development, idea closure, and idea implementation. It also distinguished eleven different roles performed by participants throughout the ideation process: initiating, supporting, disagreeing, clarifying, informing, arguing, commentary, expanding, wrapping, mobilizing, and implementing. The study also found that ideation patterns differed by idea theme and by the level of controversy of particular issues. The paper concludes with ideas for further research and recommendations for the design and implementation of online public participation processes.
机译:随着在线参与性平台的发展,许多政府正在扩展超越传统面对面会议的磋商过程。这些在线空间由政府机构使用,从公众收集思想并通过非约束表决程序汇总偏好。这些数字平台中的许多允许居民发表评论,从而创造一个想象的过程。审查由市政府发起的未经发出的在线平台的数据,本文探讨了审议过程中有机地出现的思想,如果是的话,这是如何发生的。在分析论坛辩论的20个最高讨论的想法中有超过800条评论后,该研究证实了这种情况发生并确定了该过程中的五项主要活动:想法提案,理念接待,理念,想法开发,想法关闭和理念实施。它还介绍了参与者在整个观念过程中执行的11个不同角色:启动,支持,不同意,澄清,告知,争论,评论,扩展,包装,动员和实施。该研究还发现,想法主题和特定问题的争议程度不同的思想模式不同。本文的思想与进一步研究和建议的思想结束了,为在线公共参与进程的设计和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号