首页> 外文期刊>Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age >Blockchain in or as governance? Evolutions in experimentation, social impacts, and prefigurative practice in the blockchain and DAO space
【24h】

Blockchain in or as governance? Evolutions in experimentation, social impacts, and prefigurative practice in the blockchain and DAO space

机译:区块链或治理? 在区块链和DAO空间中的实验,社会影响和前致思考的过程中的进化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Blockchain has become much more than simply a fintech technology, and is enabling and inspiring new conversations around politics, governance, organization, institutions and power structures. I published an attempt to start a rigorous academic treatment of ideology in the blockchain space through my master’s thesis titled Toward a Political Sociology of Blockchain at Queen’s University. Since then, there have been continued rich discussions around politics and experimentation in line with the ideals of the blockchain movement. Examples include discussion of blockchain governance as a social contract, discussion of social scalability and how this enables us to organize, forums such as etherean.org, and movements such as RadicalxChange.org and the concept of Liberal Radicalism. Some of these movements have been started by similar actors in the blockchain space: Vitalik Buterin of the Ethereum project co-authored the paper on Liberal Radicalism which is deeply intertwined with RadicalxChange and the ethos of decentralization, and Lane Rettig is an Ethereum core developer and launched Etherean.org to be a non-maximalist community-based discussion of social aspects and implications around the emerging technology. While the cryptocurrency markets trended downward throughout 2018, there have been strong social indicators of a more mature system though increased interdisciplinary participation and development around the technology as well as increased interest by the public sector for use cases such as records keeping and identity solutions. I expand upon some of the concepts discussed in my thesis, and provide further evidence for the particular observations based on additional events I attended and took part in through late 2018 and early 2019. Primarily, additional evidence is taken from my attendance at both the ETHDenver and RadicalxChange conferences. I further develop some of the ideas and connections between the community that has emerged around blockchain technology, and the more recent adaptations in the political sphere, as well as implications of new forms of social organization allowed through the use of such technology.
机译:区块链已经变得不仅仅是金融气技术,并且正在能够和鼓励关于政治,治理,组织,机构和电力结构的新谈话。我刊登了一直试图通过我的硕士学位在皇后大学的区块链的政治社会学中的硕士学位,开始对区间的思想思想的严格学术待遇。从那时起,在政治和实验中逐渐讨论了符合区块链运动的理想和实验的讨论。示例包括讨论区块链治理作为社会合同,对社会可扩展性的讨论以及如何使我们能够组织,诸如ektharean.org等的论坛,以及radiCalXchange.org等运动和自由主义主义的概念。这些运动中的一些运动是由平区间空间中的类似演员:vitalikbutin的vitalip项目在国内项目的情况下,在自由主义主义上共同撰写论文,这对自由主义主义进行了深入的,这是与游离基克奇的和权力下放的民主共同交织在一起,道路rettig是一个以外核心开发者推出了以太亚人.org是一个非最大的社区社区的社会方面讨论和新兴技术周围的影响。虽然整个2018年的加密货币向下趋势,但在技术跨学科参与和发展以及公共部门的利益增加使用案例,如记录保留和身份解决方案,但虽然增加了一个更成熟的系统,但是更加成熟的系统。我扩展了我论文中讨论的一些概念,并根据我在2018年底和2019年初参加的其他事件提供了特定意见的进一步证据。主要是,额外的证据来自我的参与者和激进的Xchange会议。我进一步制定了在区块链技术周围出现的社区之间的一些想法和联系,以及通过使用此类技术允许的新形式的社会组织的最新适应性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号