首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Signal intensity of myocardial scars at delayed-enhanced MRI.
【24h】

Signal intensity of myocardial scars at delayed-enhanced MRI.

机译:延迟增强MRI下心肌疤痕的信号强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) is defined as the appearance, in a non-acute setting, of a new diagnostic Q wave. In the recent past, delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) has provided a new imaging method for evaluating myocardial viability and to detect myocardial scars. PURPOSE: To investigate differences in tissue characteristics between UMI and recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) scars, by assessing the signal intensity (SI) detected by DE-MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized subgroup of 259 subjects from the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature of Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study was submitted to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DE-MRI-detected myocardial scars were divided in two groups, UMI and RMI, according to the hospital medical records. The scars detected by DE-MRI were analyzed by measuring SI ratio of scar tissue to normal myocardium. RESULTS: The mean SI ratio in the UMI group (4.5+/-3.0, mean+/-SD) was lower than in the RMI group 8.9+/-5.1 (P-value = 0.001). This difference was still significant (P<0.0001) after adjustment for gender, body mass index, time of image acquisition after gadolinium administration, scar transmurality, or total myocardial infarction mass. CONCLUSION: The difference in the SI ratio of the scars between the two groups most likely reflects a different contrast distribution volume of the tissues, which might indicate that UMI and RMI tissues diverge in tissue composition.
机译:背景:传统上,无法识别的心肌梗塞(UMI)被定义为在新的非急性情况下新诊断Q波的出现。在最近的过去,延迟增强磁共振成像(DE-MRI)提供了一种新的成像方法,用于评估心肌的生存能力并检测心肌的瘢痕。目的:通过评估DE-MRI检测到的信号强度(SI),研究UMI和公认的心肌梗塞(RMI)疤痕之间组织特征的差异。材料与方法:将来自乌普萨拉老年人血管研究(PIVUS)的前瞻性研究的259名受试者的随机亚组提交心脏磁共振成像(MRI)。根据医院的医疗记录,DE-MRI检测到的心肌疤痕分为UMI和RMI两组。通过测量瘢痕组织与正常心肌的SI比,分析通过DE-MRI检测到的瘢痕。结果:UMI组的平均SI比(4.5 +/- 3.0,平均值+/- SD)低于RMI组的8.9 +/- 5.1(P值= 0.001)。调整性别,体重指数,施用g后的图像获取时间,疤痕透壁性或总心肌梗塞质量后,这种差异仍然很显着(P <0.0001)。结论:两组瘢痕的SI比值差异最可能反映了组织的对比分布量不同,这可能表明UMI和RMI组织在组织组成上存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号