...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >To be (routine) or not to be (routine), that is the question: a cross-country task-based answer
【24h】

To be (routine) or not to be (routine), that is the question: a cross-country task-based answer

机译:是(例程)或不成为(例程),这是问题:基于跨国任务的答案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work proposes a new measure of the routine content of occupations and sectors for 20 OECD countries, based on information about the sequence and flexibility of the tasks performed on the job. A negative but weak association emerges between routineness and skill intensity, which suggests the importance of both technological and organizational considerations in the measure of routine intensity. Between 2000 and 2010, employment mainly grew in non-routine occupations, especially in market services, while manufacturing shed routine and non-routine jobs. Changes in shares of employment by routine quartile are dominated by within-effects.
机译:这项工作提出了新的衡量有关在工作中任务的序列和灵活性的信息的经合组织国家的职业和部门的常规内容。 常规和技能强度之间出现了负面但薄弱的关联,这表明在常规强度的衡量标准中的技术和组织考虑的重要性。 在2000年至2010年期间,就业主要是在非常规职业中增长,特别是在市场服务中,而制造棚惯例和非日常工作。 常规四分位数的就业份额的变化是由内部效果主导的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号