Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review

Meher S.; Alfirevic Z.

首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review

【24h】

Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review

机译：随机试验中主要结果的选择以及评估早产预防干预措施的系统评价：系统评价

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Background The inappropriate and inconsistent selection of primary outcomes (POs) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) can make evidence difficult to interpret, limiting its usefulness to inform clinical practice.

机译：背景技术随机对照试验（RCT）和系统评价（SR）中对主要结局（PO）的不适当选择和不一致选择可能会使证据难以解释，从而限制了其在临床实践中的有用性。

著录项

来源
《BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology》 |2014年第10期|共7页
作者
Meher S.; Alfirevic Z.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类妇产科学;
关键词
Clinical trials; consensus; core outcome sets; methodology; outcome reporting bias; outcomes; preterm birth; systematic review;

机译：临床试验;共识;核心结果集;方法论;结果报告偏倚;结果;早产;系统评价;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review [J] . Meher S., Alfirevic Z. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology . 2014,第10期

机译：随机试验中主要结果的选择以及评估早产预防干预措施的系统评价：系统评价
2. Primary and secondary prevention of preterm birth: a review of systematic reviews and ongoing randomized controlled trials [J] . Matei Anca, Saccone Gabriele, Vogel Joshua P., European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal . 2019,第期

机译：预防早产的初级和二级预防：对系统评价和正在进行的随机对照试验进行审查
3. A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set [J] . Durnea Constantin M., Pergialiotis Vasilios, Duffy James M. N., International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction . 2018,第12期

机译：随机试验中的结果和结果测量报告的系统审查评估前房外科阴道脱垂的外科干预：呼吁采取行动开发核心结果集
4. Systematic Review of Obesogenic Environmental Determinants of Diet and the Implications of Obesity Prevention and Intervention Efforts [C] . Angela Chang, Matthew T. Liu, Peter J. Schulz International Conference on Global Health Challenges . 2015

机译：肥胖环境决定因素的系统评论及肥胖预防和干预措施的影响
5. An investigation on the determinants of the effectiveness of anti-hypertensive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [D] . Jiang, Yu 2007

机译：抗高血压药物初步预防心血管疾病有效性决定因素的调查 - 随机对照试验的系统综述
6. A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set [O] . Constantin M. Durnea, Vasilios Pergialiotis, James M. N. Duffy, -1

机译：对随机试验评估前房阴道脱垂的手术干预的结果和结果测量报告的系统评价：呼吁采取行动以开发核心结果集
7. Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Systematic Reviews of Nutritional Interventions Reporting Maternal Morbidity, Mortality, Preterm Delivery, Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age and Birth Weight Outcomes [O] . José Villar, Mario Merialdi, A. Metin Gülmezoglu, 2003

机译：随机对照试验的特征包括在营养干预的系统审查中，报告孕产妇发病率，死亡率，早产，宫内生长限制和小于妊娠期和出生体重结果

Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅