首页> 外文期刊>Acta Radiologica >Qualitative and quantitative assessment of wrist MRI at 3.0T: comparison between isotropic 3D turbo spin echo and isotropic 3D fast field echo and 2D turbo spin echo.
【24h】

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of wrist MRI at 3.0T: comparison between isotropic 3D turbo spin echo and isotropic 3D fast field echo and 2D turbo spin echo.

机译:腕部MRI在3.0T时的定性和定量评估:各向同性3D涡轮自旋回波与各向同性3D快速场回波和2D涡轮自旋回波之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Isotropic three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been applied to various joints. However, comparison for image quality between isotropic 3D MRI and two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence of the wrist at a 3T MR system has not been investigated.To compare the image quality of isotropic 3D MRI including TSE intermediate-weighted (VISTA) sequence and fast field echo (FFE) sequence with 2D TSE intermediate-weighted sequence of the wrist joint at 3.0 T.MRI was performed in 10 wrists of 10 healthy volunteers with isotropic 3D sequences (VISTA and FFE) and 2D TSE intermediate-weighted sequences at 3.0 T. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was obtained by imaging phantom and noise-only image. Contrast ratios (CRs) were calculated between fluid and cartilage, triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and the scapholunate ligament. Two radiologists independently assessed the visibility of TFCC, carpal ligaments, cartilage, tendons and nerves with a four-point grading scale. Statistical analysis to compare CRs (one way ANOVA with a Tukey test) and grades of visibility (Kruskal-Wallis test) between three sequences and those for inter-observer agreement (kappa analysis) were performed.The SNR of 2D TSE (46.26) was higher than those of VISTA (23.34) and 3D FFE (19.41). CRs were superior in 2D TSE than VISTA (P = 0.02) for fluid-cartilage and in 2D TSE than 3D FFE (P < 0.01) for fluid-TFCC. The visibility was best in 2D TSE (P < 0.01) for TFCC and in VISTA (P = 0.01) for scapholunate ligament. The visibility was better in 2D TSE and 3D FFE (P = 0.04) for cartilage and in VISTA than 3D FFE (P < 0.01) for TFCC. The inter-observer agreement for the visibility of anatomic structures was moderate or substantial.Image quality of 2D TSE was superior to isotropic 3D MR imaging for cartilage, and TFCC. 3D FFE has better visibility for cartilage than VISTA and VISTA has superior visibility for TFCC to 3D FFE and the visibility for scapholunate ligament was best on VISTA.
机译:各向同性的三维(3D)磁共振成像(MRI)已应用于各种关节。但是,还没有研究在3T MR系统上进行各向同性3D MRI与手腕的二维(2D)Turbo Spin echo(TSE)序列之间图像质量的比较。加权(VISTA)序列和快速场回波(FFE)序列,在3.0 T时腕关节采用2D TSE中等加权序列。在10名健康志愿者的10个腕部中进行了MRI,这些志愿者的各向同性3D序列(VISTA和FFE)和2D TSE中间加权序列在3.0T。通过对幻像和纯噪声图像进行成像获得信噪比(SNR)。计算液体和软骨,三角纤维软骨复合物(TFCC)和肩cap韧带之间的对比度(CR)。两名放射科医生以四点分级量表独立评估了TFCC,腕关节韧带,软骨,肌腱和神经的可见性。进行统计分析以比较三个序列与观察者之间一致性的CR(单向方差分析与Tukey检验)和可见度等级(Kruskal-Wallis检验)(kappa分析)。二维TSE的SNR(46.26)为高于VISTA(23.34)和3D FFE(19.41)。对于流体运输,CR在2D TSE方面优于VISTA(P = 0.02),而对于流体TFCC在2D TSE中则优于3D FFE(P <0.01)。对于TFCC,在2D TSE(P <0.01)和对于肩cap韧带的VISTA(P = 0.01)中可见性最好。在2D TSE和3D FFE中,软骨和VISTA的可见性比在TFCC中3D FFE(P <0.01)好。观察者之间就解剖结构的可见性达成的共识是中等或充分的。对于软骨和TFCC,二维TSE的图像质量优于各向同性3D MR成像。 3D FFE的软骨可见性比VISTA更好,而VISTA的TFCC可见性比3D FFE更好,而肩and韧带的可见性在VISTA上最好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号