首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
【24h】

Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.

机译:产程中异常心电图的临床决策中观察者之间的共识:CTG和CTG加STAN的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are two main problems with this study.1. The authors use as the denominators for the estimation of the 95% confidence intervals the number of trials of agreement. But these trials of agreement are not independent of one another. It is the number of the subjects that should be the denominator. The correct 95% confidence interval for the overall agreement of car-diotocography (CTG) is 0.78 (0.64, 0.93); and for CTG plus ST waveform analysis (STAN) is 0.83 (0.70, 0.97). With the number of subjects as the denominator, none of the comparisons carried out by the authors reach the conventional level of statistical significance.
机译:这项研究存在两个主要问题:1。作者使用分母来评估协议试验的次数,即95%置信区间。但是,这些对协议的试验并不是彼此独立的。分母应该是科目数。放射线照相术(CTG)总体一致性的正确95%置信区间为0.78(0.64,0.93);对于CTG加ST波形分析(STAN)为0.83(0.70,0.97)。以受试者人数为分母,作者进行的所有比较均未达到常规的统计意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号