首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Assisted reproductive technology ( ART ART ) cumulative live birth rates following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ( PGD PGD ‐A) or morphological assessment of embryos: A cohort analysis
【24h】

Assisted reproductive technology ( ART ART ) cumulative live birth rates following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ( PGD PGD ‐A) or morphological assessment of embryos: A cohort analysis

机译:辅助生殖技术(艺术艺术)累积活产率伴随胚胎(PGD PGD -A)的遗传遗传诊断或胚胎的形态学评估:群组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ( PGD ‐A) for all 24 chromosomes improves implantation and clinical pregnancy rates per single assisted reproductive technology ( ART ) cycle. However, there is limited data on the live‐birth rate of PGD ‐A over repeated cycles. Aim To assess the cumulative live‐birth rates ( CLBR ) of PGD ‐A compared with morphological assessment of embryos of up to three ‘complete ART cycles’ (fresh plus frozen/thaw cycles) in women aged 37?years or older. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study of ART treatments undertaken by ART ‐na?ve women at a large Australian fertility clinic between 2011 and 2014. Cohorts were assigned based on the embryo selection method used in their first fresh cycle [ PGD ‐A, n ?=?110 women ( PGD ‐A group); morphological assessment of embryos, n ?=?1983 women (control group)]. CLBR , time to clinical pregnancy and cycles needed to achieve a live birth were measured over multiple cycles. Results Compared to the control group, the PGD ‐A group achieved a higher per cycle live‐birth rate (14.47% vs 9.12%, P ??0.01), took a shorter mean time to reach a clinical pregnancy leading to a live‐birth (104.8?days vs 140.6?days, P ??0.05) and required fewer cycles to achieve a live‐birth (6.91 cycles vs 10.96 cycles, P ??0.01). However, after three ‘complete ART cycles’, the CLBR was comparable for the two groups (30.90% vs 26.77%, P ?=?0.34). Conclusion This is the first study to assess the effectiveness of PGD ‐A over multiple ART cycles. These real‐world findings suggest that PGD ‐A leads to better outcomes than using morphological assessment alone in women of advanced maternal age.
机译:背景技术所有24条染色体的非百倍(PGD -A)的遗传遗传诊断改善了每单辅助生殖技术(ART)循环的植入和临床妊娠率。但是,关于PGD -A在重复周期上的生存速率有限的数据。目的评估PGD -A的累积生物速率(CLBR) - 与37岁时或以上的女性最多三个“完全艺术循环”(新鲜加冷冻/解冻循环)的形态学评估相比。材料和方法2011年至2011年间大型澳大利亚生育诊所的艺术作业妇女进行的艺术治疗的回顾性队列研究。基于其第一个新鲜循环中使用的胚胎选择方法进行群组[PGD -A,N ?=?110女性(PGD -A组);胚胎的形态学评估,N?= 1983岁女性(对照组)]。 CLBR,测量临床妊娠和患有活产出生的循环的时间在多个周期上测量。结果与对照组相比,PGD -A组每循环生物出生率达到更高(14.47%Vs 9.12%,p?0. 0.01),达到临床怀孕,导致临床怀孕 - 生状(104.8?天与140.6?天,p?0.05)并要求较少的循环才能实现生物出生(6.91个循环与10.96循环,p≤0.01)。然而,在三个“完全艺术循环”之后,CLBR对两组相当(30.90%vs 26.77%,p?= 0.34)。结论这是第一次评估PGD -A在多个艺术周期上的有效性的研究。这些现实研究发现表明,PGD -A导致更好的结果,而不是使用先进产妇年龄的女性的形态评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号