Mic preamps might look straightforward, but Andy Szikla uncovers the many trade-offs of designing a 'wire with gain'. In one of his books about lateral thinking. Edward de Bono talks about a bunch of designers sitting around a big table trying to re-invent the airplane. One guy wants to put in more seats so they can make more money per flight. Another wants less seats to make it easier for the peanut cart to get down the middle. One wants bigger fuel tanks so they can fly further. Another wants smaller fuel tanks so they can fit more baggage in. On it goes around the table as paradigm challenges paradigm, and conflicts are argued about and eventually resolved. Everyone there knows they all have the same goal, and that is to make a great airplane. However, they are also aware that at the end of their deliberations, if the thing won't fly, they've all failed.
展开▼
机译：MIC Preamps可能会直截了当，但Andy Szikla揭示了设计“带增益”的许多权衡。 在他的一个关于横向思维的书中。 Edward de Bono谈到了一群坐在一张大型桌子周围试图重新发明飞机的设计师。 一个人想要放入更多座位，所以每次飞行可以赚更多钱。 另一个人想要更少的座位使花生车更容易下降。 一个人想要更大的燃料箱，所以他们可以进一步飞行。 另一个想要较小的燃料箱，所以它们可以适应更多的行李。在桌子上作为范式挑战范式，并争论冲突并最终得到解决。 每个人都知道他们都有相同的目标，这就是制作一架伟大的飞机。 然而，他们也意识到在他们的审议结束时，如果事情不会飞，他们都失败了。
展开▼
