The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews?

Kay Dickersin; Riaz Qureshi

首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews?

【24h】

The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews?

机译：报告患者护理中的偏见的重要性：我们可以信任来自个别研究或系统评论的证据吗？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面目录资料

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

文献数据库（团队版） >>

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Annals of Internal Medicine》 |2018年第6期|共2页
作者
Kay Dickersin; Riaz Qureshi;
展开▼
作者单位

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland (K.D. R.Q.);

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland (K.D. R.Q.);

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类内科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews? [J] . Kay Dickersin, Riaz Qureshi Annals of Internal Medicine . 2018,第6期

机译：报告患者护理中的偏见的重要性：我们可以信任来自个别研究或系统评论的证据吗？
2. Prolonged infusion of sedatives and analgesics in adult intensive care patients: A systematic review of pharmacokinetic data reporting and quality of evidence [J] . Tse Andrew H. W., Ling Lowell, Joynt Gavin M., Pharmacological research: The official journal of The Italian Pharmacological Society . 2017,第期

机译：在成人密集护理患者中长期输注镇静剂和镇痛药：对药代动力学数据报告的系统审查和证据质量
3. Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review [J] . Julian P T Higgins, Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie BMJ Open . 2018,第3期

机译：评估研究和研究综合报告偏倚风险的工具：系统综述
4. Assessing the evidence of published studies reporting factors associated with the stability of influenza in the environment using a systematic review [C] . Christa K. Irwin, Annette OConnor, Chong Wang, Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians . 2010

机译：使用系统审查评估与环境中环境稳定性相关的发表研究报告因素的证据
5. Updating systematic reviews: The policies and practices of health care organizations involved in evidence synthesis [D] . Garritty, Chantelle Marie 2009

机译：更新系统评价：参与证据综合的卫生保健组织的政策和实践
6. Does access to clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency reduce reporting biases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients [O] . Eliane Rohner, Michael Grabik, Thomy Tonia, 2011

机译：从欧洲药品管理局获得临床研究报告是否可以减少报告偏倚？癌症患者促红细胞生成药物作用的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Does access to clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency reduce reporting biases? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients. [O] . Eliane Rohner, Michael Grabik, Thomy Tonia, 2017

机译：获取欧洲药品管理局的临床研究报告是否会减少报告偏差？关于红细胞生成刺激剂对癌症患者影响的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Importance of Reporting Biases in Patient Care: Can We Trust the Evidence From Either Individual Studies or Systematic Reviews?

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅