【24h】

Expert Opinion Is Necessary: Delphi Panel Methodology Facilitates a Scientific Approach to Consensus

机译:专家意见是必要的:Delphi Panel方法有助于一种科学的达成共识方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our current trend and focus on evidence-based medicine is biased in favor of randomized controlled trials, which are ranked highest in the hierarchy of evidence while devaluing expert opinion, which is ranked lowest in the hierarchy. However, randomized controlled trials have weaknesses as well as strengths, and no research method is flawless. Moreover, stringent application of scientific research techniques, such as the Delphi Panel methodology, allows survey of experts in a high quality and scientific manner. Level V evidence (expert opinion) remains a necessary component in the armamentarium used to determine the answer to a clinical question.
机译:我们目前的趋势和专注于循证医学的偏见有利于随机对照试验,这在证据等级中排名最高,而贬值专家意见,在层次结构中排名最低。 然而,随机对照试验具有弱点以及优点,没有研究方法完美无瑕。 此外,严格应用科学研究技术,例如Delphi面板方法,允许以高质量和科学的方式调查专家。 v v证据(专家意见)仍然是用于确定临床问题的答案的军备群体中的必要组成部分。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号