...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Gravity Fluid Flow More Accurately Reflects Joint Fluid Pressure Compared With Commercial Peristaltic Pump Systems in a Cadaveric Model
【24h】

Gravity Fluid Flow More Accurately Reflects Joint Fluid Pressure Compared With Commercial Peristaltic Pump Systems in a Cadaveric Model

机译:与尸体模型中的商业蠕动泵系统相比,重力流体流动更准确地反映关节流体压力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate intra-articular fluid pressures and joint compliance generated by fluid management systems on cadaveric shoulders and knees under simulated arthroscopic conditions, and to compare joint compliance between knee and shoulder specimens. Methods: Intra-articular pressures of 5 cadaver shoulders and 5 knees were recorded for 4 arthroscopic pumps (Stryker FloControl, Stryker CrossFlow, Arthrex DualWave, DePuy Mitek FMS Duo) and a gravity feed system. Each specimen was tested 6 times with a pressure transducer for 2 minutes at 0, 25%, and 50% suction. The average pressures were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference tests (P .05). Results: At all suction levels, all pumps exhibited significantly greater pressure than gravity feed (P = .001 to P .001). At both 25% and 50% suction, FloControl displayed significantly greater pressures (P-max 160.44 mm Hg) than the other pumps or gravity feed (P-max 46.9 mm Hg). CrossFlow had the lowest net percentage error (36.8%, 18.4 mm Hg) when compared with the standard pressure of 50 mm Hg, followed by gravity feed. All pumps had large initial overshoot (ie, P-initial CrossFlow 99.4 mm Hg) followed by settling time, whereas gravity feed did not (P-initial 55.2 mm Hg). Conclusions: Gravity feed is an accurate, reliable delivery method for arthroscopic fluid with minimal overshoot and lower intra-articular pressure ranges than commercial pump systems. There was no evidence of plastic deformation of the joint capsule, because capsular compliance increased linearly in both knee and shoulder specimens throughout testing within the established safe range of intra-articular pressures. Clinical Relevance: Arthroscopic flow management systems produce maximal and overshoot pressures that are not seen with gravity flow. Surgeons should understand intraarticular pressure and fluid delivery behavior during shoulder and knee arthroscopy to adapt to the variability and higher maximal pressures when using pump systems. Maintaining appropriate pressure could prevent fluid extravasation and possible neuromuscular dysfunction.
机译:目的:在模拟关节镜条件下评估由流体管理系统对尸体管肩部和膝关节产生的关节内流体压力和关节顺应性,并比较膝关节和肩部标本之间的关节符合性。方法:4个关节镜泵(Stryker Flocontrol,Stryker Crossflow,Arthrex Dualwave,Depuy Mitek FMS Duo)记录了5个尸体肩部和5个膝关节的关节压力和5个膝关节。用压力传感器测试每种样品6次,在0,25%和50%吸入下2分钟。分析平均压力以单向差异分析和Tukey诚实的差异试验(P <.05)。结果:在所有吸入水平上,所有泵的压力明显高于重力进料(P = .001至P& .001)。在25%和50%的吸力下,Flocontrol显着更大的压力(p-max 160.44 mm hg)比其他泵或重力进给(p-max 46.9 mm hg)。与50 mm Hg的标准压力相比,Crossflow的净百分比误差(36.8%,18.4 mm Hg),然后是重力进料。所有泵的初始过冲大(即,P初始交叉流量99.4 mm Hg),然后稳定时间,而重力饲料没有(p-initial 55.2 mm hg)。结论:重力饲料是一种准确,可靠的递送方法,用于关节镜流体,其超冲击性最小,并且关节内压力范围较低而不是商业泵系统。没有证据表明联合胶囊的塑性变形,因为在膝关节和肩部标本的既定安全范围内,囊状顺应性在膝关节和肩部标本中都有线性增加。临床相关性:关节镜流量管理系统产生具有重力流动未见的最大和过冲压力。外科医生应了解肩部和膝关节视镜期间的内部压力和流体输送行为,以适应使用泵系统时的可变性和更高的最大压力。保持适当的压力可以防止液体外渗和可能的神经肌肉功能障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号