...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Vertical and Rotational Stiffness of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study of 3 Different Techniques
【24h】

Vertical and Rotational Stiffness of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study of 3 Different Techniques

机译:岩皮韧带重建的垂直和旋转刚度:3种不同技术的生物力学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques under rotational and vertical loading using a cadaveric model. Methods: In total, 12 cadaveric shoulders were used for testing. The native state was first tested then followed by 3 different reconstruction configurations using suture tapes and cortical buttons: coracoid loop (CL), single-bundle (SB), and double-bundle (DB). Superior displacement was measured by cycling an inferiorly directed force of 70 N to the scapula. The rotational stiffness of the scapula was determined by cycling the scapula in rotational displacement control between 15 degrees of internal and external rotation. The rotational stiffness of the clavicle was determined by rotating the clavicle around its long axis 20 degrees anteriorly and 30 degrees posteriorly in rotational displacement control. All measurements were captured over 10 cycles at a rate of 200 Hz. Results: Both the CL and SB techniques demonstrated significantly less internal scapular rotation stiffness. (intact: 19.70 +/- 9.07 cNm/deg, CL: 3.70 +/- 2.63 cNm/deg, SB:4.30 +/- 2.66 cNm/deg, P<.001) External scapular rotation stiffness was significantly decreased in all techniques (intact: 17.70 +/- 4.43 cNm/deg, CL: 3.30 +/- 1.37 cNm/deg, SB: 4.50 +/- 1.56 cNm/deg, DB: 4.67 +/- 1.99 cNm/deg, P<.001). The CL and SB reconstructions were significantly less stiff with regards to posterior rotation of the clavicle (intact: 5.60 +/- 1.80 cNm/deg, CL: 2.90 +/- 1.10 cNm/deg, SB: 1.40 +/- 0.65 cNm/deg, P<.001). Anterior rotation stiffness of the clavicle was significantly lower in all of the reconstructions (intact: 6.95 +/- 1.90 cNm/deg, CL: 3.08 +/- 0.84 cNm/deg, SB: 3.64 +/- 0.93 cNm/deg, DB: 4.48 +/- 1.21 cNm/deg, P<.001). Conclusions: None of the described techniques provided equivalent rotational stability in all planes compared with the native state. DB reconstruction presented stiffness characteristics closest to the native state under cyclic loading during internal scapular and posterior clavicular rotation. Clinical Relevance: Additional procedures such as tendon grafting or acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction may be required to control rotational stability.
机译:目的:使用尸体模型比较旋转和垂直载荷下3种不同芥菜重建技术的生物力学稳定性。方法:总共12种尸体肩部用于测试。首次测试本地状态,然后使用缝合线带和皮质按钮进行3个不同的重建配置:色谱回路(CL),单束(SB)和双束(DB)。通过将70 n的向下定向力循环到肩胛骨来测量卓越的位移。肩胛骨的旋转刚度通过在旋转位移控制中循环15度的内部和外部旋转来确定。通过在旋转位移控制后部向后旋转其长轴20度围绕其长轴20度旋转锁骨来确定锁骨的旋转刚度。所有测量均以200 Hz的速率超过10个循环。结果:CL和SB技术都表现出显着较差的内部肩胛旋转刚度。 (完整:19.70 +/- 9.07 CNM / DEG,CL:3.70 +/- 2.63 CNM / DEG,SB:4.30 +/- 2.66 CNM / DEG,P <.001)外肩肩旋转刚度在所有技术中显着降低(完好无线:17.70 +/- 4.43 CNM / DEG,CL:3.30 +/- 1.37 CNM / DEG,SB:4.50 +/- 1.56 CNM / DEG,DB:4.67 +/- 1.99 CNM / DEG,P <.001)。关于锁骨的后旋转(完整:5.60 +/- 1.80 CNM / DEG,CL:2.90 +/- 1.10 CNM / DEG,SB:1.40 +/- 0.65 CNM / DEG ,p <.001)。所有重建中锁骨的前旋转刚度显着降低(完整:6.95 +/- 1.90 CNM / DEG,CL:3.08 +/- 0.84 CNM / DEG,SB:3.64 +/- 0.93 CNM / DEG,DB: 4.48 +/- 1.21 CNM / DEG,P <.001)。结论:与本地状态相比,所描述的技术没有提供所有平面中的等同旋转稳定性。 DB重建在内肩胛骨旋转期间循环加载下最接近天然状态的刚度特性。临床相关性:可能需要诸如肌腱接枝或肩胛上韧带重建的其他程序来控制旋转稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号