首页> 外文期刊>Administration and policy in mental health >Do users of risperidone who switch brands because of generic reference pricing fare better or worse than non-switchers? A New Zealand natural experiment
【24h】

Do users of risperidone who switch brands because of generic reference pricing fare better or worse than non-switchers? A New Zealand natural experiment

机译:由于通用参考定价而转换品牌的利培酮使用者的价格是否比非转换者好还是差?新西兰的自然实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluated patient health outcomes and any impact on healthcare costs consequent to the implementation of generic reference-pricing of risperidone in New Zealand using national datasets. Reference pricing risperidone reduced the price of the originator brand by 50 % as well as overall expenditure on risperidone tablets. Half of all patients made a single switch to generic risperidone, with the remainder making multiple switches between brands. 1.5 % made a switch-back to the originator brand. No difference was found in use of healthcare services between switchers and non-switchers of the originator brand or versus the comparator group. This refutes the available literature on brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic switching.
机译:这项研究使用国家数据集评估了患者在新西兰实施利培酮通用参考定价后的健康状况以及对医疗费用的任何影响。利培酮的参考价格将原品牌的价格降低了50%,同时使利培酮片剂的总支出降低了50%。所有患者中有一半将单一药物转换为通用利培酮,其余患者则在品牌之间进行了多次转换。 1.5%的消费者转回了原创品牌。发起者品牌的转接者和非转接者之间的医疗保健服务使用情况或与比较组之间的医疗服务使用上没有发现差异。这驳斥了有关品牌到通用和通用到通用转换的文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号