...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >No difference in the graft shift between a round and a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental study
【24h】

No difference in the graft shift between a round and a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental study

机译:圆形和圆形长方形股隧道之间的移植物移位没有差异,用于前令韧带重建:实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction We developed a novel technique of creating a rounded rectangular femoral bone tunnel for anatomical, single-bundle, autologous hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Although this tunnel has many advantages, its non-circular shape has raised concerns regarding excessive graft shift within the bone tunnel. This study aimed to compare the graft shift between round and rounded rectangular tunnels using a graft diameter tester for simulating the femoral bone tunnel.Materials and methods Seven semitendinosus tendon grafts harvested from fresh-frozen cadavers were prepared by removing all excess soft tissue. The two ends of a double-fold hamstring tendon were sutured using a baseball stitch and then looped over a TightRope (Arthrex Co., Ltd., Naples, Florida, USA) to make a fourfold graft. The diameter of the graft was standardized to 8 mm using a round graft diameter tester. A round and an original rounded rectangular graft diameter tester were used for simulating the respective femoral bone tunnels. The graft was inserted into the tunnel, with the TightRope positioned on the outside of the tunnel. The distal end of the graft was tensioned to 40 N at an angle of 75° to reproduce the most severe graft bending angle. Digital photographs of the tunnel aperture taken at each simulated tunnel and the range of graft shift in the simulated tunnel were analyzed by ImageJ software. Statistical analyses were performed using the Tukey test. P<0.05 was considered to be significant.Results There were no significant differences between the round and the rounded rectangular tunnel groups (P>0.05) in terms of graft shift, gap area, and graft shift ratio.Conclusion In a simulated ACL reconstruction, there is no difference in the graft shift between a round and a rounded rectangular bone tunnel.
机译:简介我们开发了一种新颖的技术,用于为解剖,单束,自体腿筋肌腱前十字韧带(ACL)重建进行圆形矩形股骨隧道。尽管该隧道具有许多优点,但其非圆形形状已经提出了关于骨隧道内过度移植物的担忧。本研究旨在使用用于模拟股骨骨隧道的移植直径测试仪比较圆形和圆形矩形隧道之间的移植移位。通过除去所有多余的软组织,制备从新鲜冷冻尸体中收获的7种半念珠菌肌腱移植物。双折腿筋肌腱的两端是使用棒球针脚缝合,然后循环在绳索(Arthrex Co.,Ltd,Naples,Florida,USA)上循环,以制作四倍移植物。使用圆形移植直径测试仪将移植物的直径标准化为8mm。圆形和原始的圆形矩形移植直径测试仪用于模拟相应的股骨隧道。将移植物插入隧道中,其绳索位于隧道外侧。移植物的远端以75°的角度张紧至40n,以再现最严重的接枝弯曲角度。通过ImageJ软件分析了在每个模拟隧道处拍摄的隧道孔径的数字照片和模拟隧道中的移植隧道范围。使用Tukey测试进行统计分析。 P <0.05被认为是显着的。结果在接枝移位,间隙区域和移植移位比方面,圆形和圆角矩形隧道组(P> 0.05)之间没有显着差异。结论模拟ACL重建,圆形和圆形矩形骨隧道之间的移植物偏移没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号