首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response
【24h】

Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response

机译:upAdacitinib或Adalimalab加上类风湿性关节炎的甲氨蝶呤的安全性和有效性在48周内,随着反应不足的患者交替治疗,患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In SELECT-COMPARE, a randomised double-blind study, upadacitinib 15 mg once daily was superior to placebo or adalimumab on background methotrexate (MTX) for treating rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms and inhibited radiographical progression versus placebo at 26 weeks. Here we report 48-week safety and efficacy in patients who continued their original medication or were rescued to the alternative medication for insufficient response.Patients on MTX received upadacitinib 15 mg, placebo or adalimumab for 48 weeks. Rescue without washout, from placebo or adalimumab to upadacitinib or upadacitinib to adalimumab occurred if patients had 10 (week 26); remaining placebo patients were switched to upadacitinib at week 26. Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation), as well as separately for rescued patients (as observed). Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years were summarised.Consistent with responses through week 26, from weeks 26 to 48, responses by randomised group including low disease activity, clinical remission and improvements in pain and function remained superior for upadacitinib versus adalimumab; radiographical progression remained lower for upadacitinib versus placebo (linear extrapolation). Although both switch groups responded, a higher proportion of patients rescued to upadacitinib from adalimumab achieved CDAI ≤10 at 6 months postswitch versus patients rescued from upadacitinib to adalimumab. Safety at week 48 was comparable to week 26.Upadacitinib+MTX demonstrated superior clinical and functional responses versus adalimumab+MTX and maintained inhibition of structural damage versus placebo+MTX through week 48. Patients with an insufficient response to adalimumab or upadacitinib safely achieved clinically meaningful responses after switching to the alternative medication without washout.
机译:在精选比较中,随机双盲研究,upadacitinib 15mg每日一次,甲氨蝶呤(MTX)上的安慰剂或阿达木单抗优于用于治疗类风湿性关节炎的症状和症状,并在26周时抑制放疗射线显影性进展。在这里,我们向继续原始药物的患者报告48周的安全性和疗效,或者被救出到替代药物中的替代药物,以进行反应不足。MTX上的患者接受UPAdacitinib 15 mg,安慰剂或达达罗单抗48周。如果患者有10个(第26周),则从安慰剂或阿巴木单抗到upadacitinib或upadacitinib的救援,如果患者发生了10(第26周);将剩余的安慰剂患者在第26周切换到upadacitinib.随机组(非响应者归因)分析疗效,以及救出患者(如观察到)分别分析。总结了每100例患者患者的治疗紧急不良事件。通过第26周的回应,从第26周至48之间,随机组的反应,包括低疾病活动,临床缓解和疼痛和功能的改善仍然优于upadacitinib与atabalimumab仍然优越; upadacitinib与安慰剂(线性外推)留下射线照相进展。虽然两个交换机组响应,但从服从upairimalab救出到upadacitinib的患者的较高比例均为≤10,与从upadacitinib从upadacitinib中拯救给Adalimalab的患者。第48周的安全性可与周26.Upadacitinib + MTX相比,通过第48周,upAdacitinib + MTX与Adalimalab + MTX相比,对Adalimalab + MTX进行了抑制作用与安慰剂+ MTX的抑制作用。对Adalimalab或Upadacitinib不足的患者安全地实现临床有意义的患者切换到没有冲洗的替代药物后的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号