...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Differences in Waiting List Prioritization Preferences of Occupational Therapists, Elderly People, and Persons With Disabilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment
【24h】

Differences in Waiting List Prioritization Preferences of Occupational Therapists, Elderly People, and Persons With Disabilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment

机译:职业治疗师,老年人和残疾人的等待列表优先级偏好的差异:离散选择实验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objective To compare the preferences of occupational therapists, elderly people, and adults with disabilities regarding prioritization criteria for occupational therapy waiting lists in home care. Design Discrete choice experiment survey. Setting Survey mailed to occupational therapists working in home care and community-dwelling elderly or disabled persons. Participants A sample (N=714) of home-based occupational therapists (n=241), elderly persons from a bank of research participants (n=226), and adults with physical disabilities recruited through community organizations (n=247). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures The dependent variable was whether the referral scenario was prioritized or not in each question. The results were analyzed through logistic regression using conditional logit models. Results Prioritization preferences differed between groups ( P Conclusions Our results highlight the gap between the priorities of home-based occupational therapists and their target clientele. Although further inquiry is needed to inform priority setting, the findings emphasize the importance of public or patient involvement in decisions on waiting list prioritization. Highlights ? Referral prioritization in home care occupational therapy is not standardized. ? Priorities of elderly and disabled people are different from those of occupational therapists. ? Home care occupational therapists prioritize people who fall. ? Elderly and disabled people prioritize people who cannot enter and exit the home. ? The target clientele should be consulted when establishing prioritization criteria.
机译:摘要目的比较职业治疗师,老年人和成人对残疾的偏好,了解家庭护理中职业治疗候选人名单的优先次序规范。设计离散选择实验调查。设置调查邮寄给家庭护理和社区住宅的职业治疗师,以及社区住宅的老年人或残疾人。与会者是家庭职业治疗师(n = 241)的样本(n = 714),来自研究参与者银行(n = 226)的老年人,以及通过社区组织招募的成年人(n = 247)。干预不适用。主要结果测量受抚养变量是在每个问题中是否优先考虑推荐方案。通过使用条件Logit模型的逻辑回归分析结果。结果偏出偏出的优先级偏好(P结论我们的结果突出了家庭职业治疗师及其目标客户的优先级与其目标客户之间的差距。虽然需要进一步调查来告知优先事项,但调查结果强调了公众或患者参与决策的重要性在等待名单优先级。亮点?家庭护理职业治疗中的转诊优先级不标准化。谁无法进入并退出家。?在建立优先级标准时,应咨询目标客户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号