首页> 外文期刊>Acta tropica: Journal of Biomedical Sciences >Comparison between two common methods for measuring Giardia lamblia susceptibility to antiparasitic drugs in vitro.
【24h】

Comparison between two common methods for measuring Giardia lamblia susceptibility to antiparasitic drugs in vitro.

机译:两种常用的测量贾第鞭毛虫对体外抗寄生虫药敏感性的方法之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study a comparison between two different methods for measuring the susceptibility of Giardia lamblia trophozoites to metronidazole and albendazole is performed. Modifications of Meloni's method, based on the loss of adherence of parasites to surfaces, and the Hill method, based on the loss of parasite division capacity, are compared. A logistic model was used to calculate the inhibitory concentrations IC(10), IC(50) and IC(90) that were further compared using the respective standard errors. The results obtained, after contact of parasites with the antiparasitic drugs for 24h, show that the adherence method is more sensitive than the multiplication method for low and moderate inhibitory concentrations of albendazole. Conversely for metronidazole the multiplication method seems to be more sensitive for high inhibitory concentrations of the drug. For screening the IC(50), both methods seem to be effective, however, the inhibition of adherence method have even better performance for the benzimidazole like drugs.
机译:在这项研究中,对测量贾第鞭毛虫营养体对甲硝唑和阿苯达唑的敏感性的两种不同方法进行了比较。比较了基于寄生虫对表面的粘附力损失的Meloni方法的改进方法和基于寄生虫分裂能力损失的Hill方法的改进方法。使用逻辑模型计算抑制浓度IC(10),IC(50)和IC(90),并使用各自的标准误差进行进一步比较。寄生虫与抗寄生虫药物接触24h后获得的结果表明,对于低和中等抑制浓度的阿苯达唑,粘附方法比乘法方法更灵敏。相反,对于甲硝唑,乘法方法似乎对高抑制浓度的药物更为敏感。对于筛选IC(50),两种方法似乎都是有效的,但是,抑制粘附的方法对于苯并咪唑类药物甚至具有更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号