【24h】

Highlights from this issue

机译:来自这个问题的亮点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We all give lip service to health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but few of us afford it the weight it deserves outside its use as an outcome measure in research. It is defined (very broadly) by the WHO as a 'child's goals, expectations, standards or concerns about their overall health and related domains'.1 We receive outcome information like this constantly, but rarely process it fully and given that children from 7 years upwards are capable of reliably reporting their status should, I'm convinced, be doing more. There are a number of scores in use, both general (Peds QL the most widely used) and disease specific ones2 and, given the quality of health (provision and experience) flavour in several of this month's papers (the theme to my choices) got me thinking how I could incorporate the philosophy (if not the formal scoring) better on a day to day basis.
机译:我们都给唇部服务与健康有关的生活质量(HRQOL),但我们很少有人负担得起其在其用途之外的重量作为研究中的结果。 它是由谁定义的(非常广泛),作为孩子的目标,期望,标准或对其整体健康和相关领域的担忧.1我们收到了不断的结果信息,但很少完全处理它7 年向上有能力可靠地报告他们的地位应该,我相信,做更多。 使用许多分数,一般(PEDS QL是最广泛使用的)和疾病特定的,鉴于本月篇论文中的几个人的健康质量(拨备和经验)味道(其选择的主题)得到了 我认为如何在一天的基础上更好地融入哲学(如果不是正式得分)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号