AbstractWhile geoarchaeology as a practice within archaeology grew out of many historical roots, a major role ha'/> Bridging theoretical gaps in geoarchaeology: archaeology, geoarchaeology, and history in the Yellow River valley, China
首页> 外文期刊>Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences >Bridging theoretical gaps in geoarchaeology: archaeology, geoarchaeology, and history in the Yellow River valley, China
【24h】

Bridging theoretical gaps in geoarchaeology: archaeology, geoarchaeology, and history in the Yellow River valley, China

机译:桥接地球研引神的理论间隙:黄河谷,中国的考古学,地缘学和历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AbstractWhile geoarchaeology as a practice within archaeology grew out of many historical roots, a major role has been the explication of site formation processes and site-level contextual analysis. In recent years, geoarchaeological research has branched out to encompass larger geographic scales, and to play a greater role in environmental archaeological investigations. This paper argues that geoarchaeology has a great deal to contribute to the understanding of human history and to archaeological theory through the application of multiscalar approaches that place human behavior in a physical, environmental and ecological context and by creating linkages between physical processes and human responses. We use geoarchaeological data from the Yellow River valley to show that drainage/irrigation canal and bank/levee building had commenced in the lower reaches by ca. 2900–2700?cal?B.P. The emphasis on flood plain flood control infrastructure was a result of long-term increases in sedimentation caused by large populations farming with increasingly efficient technologies in the fragile environments of the Loess Plateau. Ever increasing sedimentation set in motion a cycle of further investment in flood control works eventually leading to a massive flood catastrophe in the first 20?years of the first millennium A.D. as the Yellow River exceeded natural and human geomorphic thresholds that constrained it in its previous course. These floods arguably triggered the social and political events that brought down the Western Han Dynasty but the root causes are clearly more complex. Geoarchaeology thus contributes to an understanding of the multiple causes and consequences of large-scale social and political collapse.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ <标题>抽象 ara>,而GeoAthaeology作为考古学中的实践中的练习,是许多历史根源,一个专业角色一直是网站形成过程和站点级上下文分析的解释。近年来,地球研引力研究已经分支出来,包括更大的地理尺度,并在环境考古调查中发挥更大的作用。本文认为,通过在物理,环境和生态背景下的人类行为和物理过程与人类反应之间的联系,对人类历史和考古理论有助于了解人类历史和考古理论的贡献。我们使用来自黄河山谷的地缘学历,以表明排水/灌溉运河和银行/堤坝大楼在下游达到。 2900-2700?CAL?B.P。强调洪水平原防洪基础设施是大型人口养殖造成的沉淀造成的长期增加,在黄土高原脆弱环境中具有越来越高的技术。在动作中,沉积物的沉淀过程中进一步投资的洪水控制的循环最终导致了前20个洪水灾难,因为黄河超过了自然和人际阈值的第一个千年广告,在其上一般的课程中受到限制的自然和人际阈值。这些洪水可以说是引发了在西汉朝鲜下来的社会和政治事件,但根本原因显然更加复杂。从而有助于了解大规模社会和政治崩溃的多种原因和后果。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号