首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Effects of group housing system, pen floor type, and lactation management on performance and behaviour in rabbit does
【24h】

Effects of group housing system, pen floor type, and lactation management on performance and behaviour in rabbit does

机译:集团住房系统,笔楼等和哺乳管对兔子性能和行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This work aimed at evaluating the effects of housing system, pen floor type, and lactation management on rabbit doe and kit performance throughout a reproductive cycle, including categorization of aggressiveness and injuries. Forty multiparous pregnant does were assigned to six experimental groups: i) individual pens with plastic floor (4 does), ii) individual pens with wire floor and plastic mats (4 does), iii) collective pens with plastic floor and fixed lactation (8 does), iv) collective pens with plastic floor and random lactation (8 does), v) collective pens with wire floor and plastic mats and fixed lactation (8 does), and vi) collective pens with wire floor and plastic mats and random lactation (8 does). In collective pens, does were kept in groups from 8 d until 2 d before kindling and from 2 d until 33 d after kindling. In the fixed group, does always nursed their own litter; in the random group, a random litter from pen-mates. Behaviours were video-recorded at 8 d before kindling (- 8 d), and 2 d (+ 2 d) and 18 d (+18 d) after kindling. Injuries were scored at 5,12,19, 26, and 34 d after kindling. Bayesian inference was used to study the differences between experimental groups. During controlled lactation, doe feed intake ( + 17.3g/d; Prob(R) = 0.84) and milk production (+11.5 g/d; Prob(R) = 0.83) were higher in collective pens than in individual modules, and kit weaning weight was slightly lower (- 20.4 g; Prob(R) = 0.55). Feed intake and kit weight at weaning were lower in the fixed than in the random lactation group (Prob(R) = 0.61 - 0.89). Aggression was lower at - 8 d than at + 2 d (- 39.1 events; Prob(R), = 0.98), higher at + 2 d than at +18 d ( + 50.2 events; Prob(R) = 1.00), and higher in pens with plastic mats than with plastic slats (average across all observation days, -14.7 events; Prob(R), = 0.69). Injury rate was higher at 3 d (34%) and 10 d (47%) after does regrouped from an isolation period, compared with later time points (P & 0.05). In conclusion, aggression was high in collective pens during the short period around kindling, but doe and kit performance were not substantially affected compared with individual housing. Plastic-slatted floors reduced aggression more than plastic mats, without affecting performance. Finally, lactation method had no relevant effect. Thus, random lactation in part-time collective systems may be transferred to commercial farms without negative outcomes.
机译:这项工作旨在评估住房系统,笔地板类型和哺乳期管理在整个生殖周期中对兔子DOE和套件性能的影响,包括分类侵略性和伤害。四十多个孕妇被分配到六个实验组:i)用塑料地板(4个),ii)单个钢笔,带有电线底板和塑料垫(4个),iii)集体笔,带塑料地板和固定哺乳期(8 DON),iv)具有塑料地板的集体笔和随机哺乳(8个),v)集体笔,带有钢丝地板和塑料垫和固定哺乳(8个)和vi)集体笔,带有钢丝地板和塑料垫和随机哺乳(8)。在集体笔中,在点燃之前的8 d末期,在点燃之前,在2 d中持续,直到2 d直到33 d。在固定组中,确实始终保养自己的垃圾;在随机组中,来自笔配对的随机凋落物。在点燃( - 8d)和2d(+ 2 d)和18d(+18 d)之前,行为在8 d时被录制为8 d。在点燃后,伤害均在5,12,19,26和34 d中得分。贝叶斯推断用于研究实验组之间的差异。在受控哺乳期间,DOE进料进料(+ 17.3g / d;胰蛋白酶(r)= 0.84)和牛奶生产(+11.5 g / d;概率在集体笔的较高比各个模块和套件断奶重量略低( - 20.4克;概率(r)= 0.55)。断奶的进料摄入量和试剂盒重量在固定于随机哺乳期组中(Prob(R)= 0.61-0.89)。侵略于+ 2d( - 39.1事件;概率(r),= 0.98),+ 2 d高于+18 d(+ 50.2事件; prob(r)= 1.00)较高(r),和钢笔较高,塑料垫比塑料板条(所有观察天的平均值,-14.7事件;概率(r),= 0.69)。与稍后的时间点相比总之,在Kinding的短时间内,集体笔的侵略性高,但与个别住房相比,DOE和套件的表现并未受到影响。塑料板楼层比塑料垫更减少侵略,而不会影响性能。最后,哺乳方法没有相关的效果。因此,兼职集体系统中的随机哺乳期可以转移到商业农场而没有负面结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号