首页> 外文期刊>Applied psychology. Health and well-being >Measuring Thriving across Nations: Examining the Measurement Equivalence of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving ( CIT CIT ) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving ( BIT BIT )
【24h】

Measuring Thriving across Nations: Examining the Measurement Equivalence of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving ( CIT CIT ) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving ( BIT BIT )

机译:跨国公司蓬勃发展:检查繁荣(CIT CIT)综合库存的测量等价性和蓬勃发展的简短库存(位钻头)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Positive psychological health is a multifaceted construct and fundamental to individuals’ overall mental health. Yet, measures of positive psychological health tend to focus on only a few of these facets. Su, Tay, and Diener ([Su, R., 2014]) sought to address this by creating the Comprehensive and Brief Inventories of Thriving ( CIT / BIT ), integrative measures of well‐being that assess positive psychological health broadly. Method Given growing interest in cross‐national comparisons in positive psychological health, the present study expands on this work by examining the measurement invariance of these two measures across 10 countries ( N = 3,077). First, a series of single‐group confirmatory analyses were run to assess how well the CIT / BIT fit data from each country. Next, multi‐group confirmatory analyses were run to assess measurement invariance. Results Single‐group confirmatory factor analysis supported the original 18‐factor structure of the CIT when compared to alternative models (single factor, seven factor, bi‐factor model) in seven of the 10 countries and the single‐factor structure of the BIT across all countries. Results from the measurement invariance analysis indicated partial scalar invariance for the remaining seven countries on the CIT as well as partial scalar invariance across all countries for the BIT . Conclusion The present study extends the initial work by Su et?al. ([Su, R., 2014]) by providing evidence of the measurement invariance of the comprehensive and brief inventories of thriving across cultures. Although the factor structure of the CIT was inadmissible in three countries, the results provide a crucial first step for those interested in comparing positive psychological health across nations. Research in both using these measures and cross‐cultural comparisons on positive psychological health is growing. We hope that the current efforts help facilitate this work towards furthering the understanding of positive psychological health.
机译:背景技术正面心理健康是多方面的构建和对个人整体心理健康的基础。然而,积极心理健康的措施往往只关注这些方面的少数部分。 Su,Tay和Dieer([Su,R.,2014])试图通过创造繁荣(CIT / BIT),富集的富裕措施,广泛评估积极的心理健康的综合和简短清单来解决这一点。鉴于对积极心理健康的跨国比较越来越大的方法,本研究通过检查这两种措施的测量不变性来扩展这项工作,在10个国家(n = 3,077)。首先,运行一系列单组确认分析,以评估来自每个国家/地区的CIT /比特拟合数据。接下来,运行多组确认分析以评估测量不变性。结果单组验证因子分析支持10个国家中七个的替代模型(单一因素,七因素,双因子模型)与跨越单因素结构的替代模型(单一因素,七因素,双因子模型)的原始18因素结构。所有国家。测量不变分析的结果表明,剩下的七个国家对CIT的剩余七个国家以及所有国家的部分标量不变性。结论本研究延长了SU ET?AL的初始工作。 ([苏,R.,2014])通过提供综合性和简短清单繁荣的培养物的测量不变性的证据。虽然CIT的因素结构在三个国家不可受理,但结果为有兴趣比较国家积极心理健康的人提供了至关重要的第一步。使用这些措施和跨文化比较对积极心理健康的研究正在增长。我们希望目前的努力有助于促进这项努力进一步了解积极的心理健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号